Citizen's Duty - Repost

The following criminal complaint was filed on April 12th by this "BLOG" against Hillary Rodham Clinton. Today, we learned that the "Inspector General" is requesting such an investigation.

 ~

Mr. Steve Linick
Acting Inspector General

Office of Inspector General

United States Department of State

~

It is through this correspondence, I respectfully submit and request that the Office of Inspector General as prescribed and thus allowed under “Guidelines for Reporting Fraud” begin a formal investigation upon Hillary Rodham Clinton.

~

Of interest such an investigation involves a violation of 18 U.S.C. CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART 1 – CRIMES, Chapter 101- Records and Reports, §2071. Concealment, Removal or Mutilation Generally.

~

Specifically, a violation allegation under (b) "willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys (any record) shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States." - and as spelled-out in such guidelines consistent upon but not limited to acts of misuse and or misconduct and or mismanagement, conflict of interest, possible defense trade control violations and standards of conduct violations unbecoming an official “office” holder under oath.

~

Hillary Rodham Clinton was acting in the capacity of the Secretary of State for the United States of America, between January 21, 2009 through February 1, 2013 and it was during that tenure that Title 18 may have been victimized. Even though Hillary Rodham Clinton exercises her rights today as a “Private Citizen”, since Hillary Rodham Clinton may still be in possession of “U.S. Government Property”, the OIG's oversight and over-reach should allow such an investigation to evaluate that when acting as Secretary of State and under oath whether or not Hillary Rodham Clinton did indeed violate that “oath” with respect to “custodial” duties.

~

Only a thorough investigation can find closure with the latter questionable acts and send a message of deterrence to future government officials under oath, especially with high ranking officials acquiring responsibilities with respect to custodial duties of department records. Without a proper “Investigation”, the “American Citizens” are victimized, thus placed in harms way making an investigation not just a suggestion, but out of necessity.

~

As Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton was a “custodian” as outlined and still in effect today - SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the Secretary for the Department of Foreign Affairs, to be appointed in consequence of this act, shall forthwith after his appointment, be entitled to have the custody and charge of all records, books and papers in the office of Secretary for the Department of Foreign Affairs, heretofore established by the United States In Congress assembled – as APPROVED, July 27, 1789”.

~

Since Hillary Rodham Clinton may be showing interest as a future “Office Holder” under the United States, it is paramount that the “American Citizens” have an opportunity to make sure there have been no such violations committed that would forfeit holding such “Office”, if such a violation against the custodial records “duty” occurred. It is best to set the record straight now, as any future investigations that indicate a violation could mean “Impeachment Proceedings”, consistent with the “forfeit” clause of Title 18. We must act now, as the latter is not a posture this nation should be bothered with as it weakens our global standing.

~

A possible “custodial records” violation appears the case with respect to the e-mail correspondences exported or imported by Hillary Rodham Clinton on a non-governmental non-approved net-work while acting in the capacity of “Secretary of State” and while under “oath”. It is with this request that the “evidence” that could either “Prove” or “Disprove” any wrongdoing be immediately confiscated, that being the controversial “Server” wherein Hillary Rodham Clinton has admitted publicly an instrument utilized for “Official” concealment.

~

As the “Custodian”, Hillary Rodham Clinton may have held a privilege upon the use of a “private network” for official business, yet the “custodial” requirements are still in effect. This correspondence requesting that the OIG begin a formal investigation into such allegations confronting dereliction of responsibilities is in no way shape or form frivolous, not intended to dishonor Hillary Rodham Clinton, but an attempt to make sure the system of merit has not been derelict or violated, and if so, should deny any further privilege to holding an “office” under the “United States”, as is so defined under the existing public law.

~

This is a serious matter, and I believe it is your responsibility as Inspector General to make sure an investigation is without haste begun, or through this correspondence it is realized that the evidence supports some semblance of an investigation consistent with Title 18 and if not solely through the OIG's jurisdiction that you take this opportunity to involve other “criminal” investigative oversight, such as the FBI and/or Department of Justice.

~

Since Hilialry Rodham Clinton did recite the “Oath of Office”, we must get to the bottom of any possible wrong doing with respect to the questionable responsibilities when acting as an “official” of the Department of State.

~

It is also noted for reference: “That the books, records, and other papers of the United States, that relate to this department, be committed to his custody, to which, and all other papers of his office, any member of Congress shall have access: Provided, That no copy shall be taken of matters of a secret nature, without the special leave of Congress.” I believe the wording of “Secret Nature” is paramount to kick-off such an investigation, along with the fact Hillary Rodman Clinton has refused to allow the “private server” to be accessed “by any member of Congress”. If the Founding Fathers realized merit in establishing “law” that finds “well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.“ violated while under oath, that was considered serious enough that it would eliminate violators from holding any present or future office, we owe it to the Founders to make sure we uphold that establishment.

~

If Hillary Rodham Clinton violated Title 18, she is not allowed to hold another “office”, and only an investigation can determine that priviledge or deny that priviledge. Without a formal investigation, we dismiss this nation's integrity. 
 

Respectfully Submitted on April 12^th, 2015, by S. Pam McGee