Send Lagos to Putin

 

Putin's CUNTS for Red October

DCSB Speaks Out

Duel Citizenship Slovenian Botch-itch finally speaks out about Putin's invasion of Ukraine...then back to tennis and tweets to Russia with Love!

Vladimir Putin

 

Dear Vladimir Putin

WAR is Over NOW! 

(click link) 

 If You Want It....

HEJIRA 2/23/2022

 

HEJIRA 2/22/2022

 

George Orwell’s 1986

Opinion in Decision 

United States Dystopian Court

Case 1:21-cv-00586-APM Document 56 Filed 02/18/22 Page 40 of 112:

Hear Ye, Hear Ye comes know the United States Dystopian Court in the matter of Donald John Trump, a “Grant of Immunity” for involvement in the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol.

42 U.S.C. Section §1986 Claim - The foregoing comes with one important caveat: President Trump is immune as to Swalwell’s failure-to-act claim under §1986. That provision states: “Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned [in section 1985 of this title], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented.” - 42 U.S.C. §1986. The statutory provision is unique. It requires persons with knowledge of a conspiracy proscribed in §1985 and with the means to prevent the conspiracy to take affirmative actions to do so. A person who refuses or neglects to exercise such power is liable for damages to those persons whose injuries could have been prevented. Swalwell alone asserts a claim under §1986 against President Trump. He alleges that President Trump knew about the alleged §1985 conspiracy, had the power to prevent it, and failed to exercise “reasonable diligence” to avoid harm. Specifically, he asserts that “when it was clear that rioters had stormed the Capitol, and Congress was unable to certify the results of the Electoral College vote, [President Trump] had the power to stop the rioters but refused and, instead, encouraged them.” That allegation, it would seem, makes out a §1986 claim against the President. But the President cannot be held liable for his failure to exercise his presidential powers, at least under §1986. Just as he is immune for acts that fall within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities, so too must he be immune for alleged failures to exercise that official responsibility. Were it otherwise, Presidents routinely would be subject to suit for not doing more or for not acting at all. Absolute immunity would be gutted if a plaintiff could avoid it simply by alleging a failure to exercise presidential power. The court therefore dismisses Swalwell’s §1986 claim.

Dated: February 18, 2022

Amit P. Mehta

United States Dystopian Court Judge 

Putin's Power Grab

 

Judge Mehta Style Conjecture

Homegrown PATRIOTISM MIA

Amit the Judge or Emmitt the Clown…OK jester sounds appropriate. Look, I am a True-Blue True-Blood New England Patriot, born in America the son of a proud Irish American hard-working proletariat, my “Founding Father” who followed in his father’s footsteps. But maybe when “My Country Tis of Thee” begs for neweigners to “come on over” and thus embrace the America way of life, well we find a different kind of Patriotism. Don’t get me wrong, I embrace this sea to shining sea revival in cultures different and welcome my brothers and sisters from abroad with open arms. Come here, work hard, stay for the duration. What I am saying, the age old saying it goes with the territory and maybe lingering resistance from the other territory. Take Ted Cruz for instance, his tirades against Miss Liberty can only rest its case the fact he was born in Canada, so instead of hearing “I pledge allegiance to the flag…” the latter Red, White & Blue symbol tattered was instead a crown as in Her Majesty at first light of dawn, and that can cause “Crazy Psycho Shit” fantasies. That is how Representative Cecilline calls it out, he is also a Patriot from my home-town. And at the same time, this kind of Cruz crud missile, it is what the GOP calls “Legitimate Political Discourse”. Did I hear someone yell “bipartisan” like “Fire” in a crowded theater! Back to my bone spur of contention. Now I have worked alongside many excellent “outsiders” that have come here to embrace our way of life now as honorable law abiding “insiders”. Go ahead, criticize my choice of words and I will apologize with a Melvin “you can just shampoo my crotch”! And to emphasize, these neweigners are well deserving of that challenge and its rewards in “citizenship”. Especially many close friendships I have made along the way with individuals from India, engineers that hate the cold and love sloppy Joes! But over time when confidence allowed, many have asked me “what this Patriotism” thing is all about. And I have heard more then enough criticism, from those same well-meaning individuals that don’t understand this “Patriotism”, in belief it boils over the pot how “We the People” behave - like on the 4^th of July.  Look, like I said I learned about “Patriotism” and honor to Country before I soiled my first diaper, so it sinks in early on - but it is somewhat hard to explain, to those individuals that did not have that movement. We learned it all in kindergarten, most things, but what came first the chicken or the egg? Patriotism reigns.

So I am a little disheartened that Judge Amit Mehta has just chastised Miss Liberty, as it appears he has no idea what this “Patriotism” is all about, especially when this nation is in the grieving still process in procession through its deepest and steepest awakening, that Democracy fumbled on the 1-yard line! Just the other day in a long-awaited nightmare playing out, Judge Amit caved into individuals that have been caught red-handed aiding and abetting the “Enemy of the People”. Look, one cannot learn about this “Patriotism” from a law book! So be it in his “dismal swamp” dismissal of “Turncoats” in decision, the gavel was heard loud and clear. Patriotism has been wounded some more! Amounting to castration away forever at least “half” of Donald John Trump’s “Treason” affair and at the same time giving amnesty to Rudy Giuliani and cloak and dagger US some more, letting Donald Jr. off the hook also. And wait there’s more, a bribe for Mo Brooks?

Now since when is the “Court” allowed to bribe someone! For real, even though the news pundits are breaking open the champagne this “decision” by Judge Mehta, that the lawsuits by members of Congress against “individual Number 1” can proceed mind you with caution, as it is celebratory champagne that comes from the estate of Donald Trump - so is cesspool like cheers. Probably came from the Oval Office whiz SCIF urinal! See, for the time-being the United States District Court has now denied in part the total destruction in claims through “part and parcel guilty” dismissal of 3-pending “personal” lawsuits entered by 11-members of Congress and the Capitol police. Yes “civil” litigation which means asking a jury for beaucoup $punitive$ and additional $compensatory$ damage awards based on the “Emotional Distress” compass. Donald John Trump, Donald Jr., Ruby Giuliani, Mo Brooks and the Pound Foolish Boys are named as the defendants, in action commensurate with the before and after affects in affiliation the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol. Wherein the plaintiffs claim suffrage from that “emotional mental distress” - yet those members of Congress that have joined this litigation are still able to attend to their jobs and collect $174000 bucks - so a lawsuit for a few extra million on the sidelines makes sense, as they chose to instead find a career that is not at all about the “Honey” $Money$, it is about…the jury is still out, patience please!

Now the original signatory of one of the lawsuits timely filed against Trump and his pigeon-toed goons only 41 days and 41 nights after said “Insurrection”, Representative Bennie Thompson - who is also of record suffering from that “Crazy Psycho Shit Emotional Distress” - he bailed out and is now the Chairman of the Nancy Pelosi “Select Committee” investigating the Trump “Insurrection”. I mean with the evidence that this “Committee” is receiving, it may be doing the leg work for these civil lawsuits! Your Tax Dollars at work? So I wonder, did Bennie leave that “emotional distress” behind when Pelosi ordered him to…forget it. Back to Judge Amit Mehta.

Now in the motion filed by the Trump “Conspiracy” perpetrators to dismiss the “civil by jury” lawsuit, well the Judge broke the damn case in half, basically it was a half-baked win for Donald Trump, a full victory for Jr. and Giuliani and if Mo Brooks takes the bait in “bribe”, he will also be off the hook. The lawsuits live on, yet watered down to - it’s a pathetic legal decision as it is like 112-pages of “conjecture”. I guess the judge has nothing better to do with his time, pencil whipping…look more then ever today the courts should be on alert that it is all about how we define “Patriotism” and herein it is not the time to think one knows what that means for saving grace saving Democracy. This sanitized “opinion” that sounds like it came from a 1^st year law student every “i” dotted and every “t” crossed, well la dee frickin’ da the court can do better then this to support “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” in once a vibrant Democracy. Wherein “citizens” stood strong for “Patriotism”! Look, it would have been a greater victory in Democracy had Judge Mehta “dismissed” the claims altogether then to render this pitiful decision - in favor of Patriotism in efforts to advance a souring Democracy. As what is now of record “can and will be used against you in a court of law”, that being now that Donald Trump is infallible due “Presidential Immunity” and Rudy’s gang can get away with hijacking the free speech and debate clause. It appears “Terrorist” bent on “Treason” now have a stake in the 1^st Amendment Right.  And that is what I am getting at, forgive them for they know not what this Patriotism is all about when Democracy is under attack!

Giuliani and Donald Jr. and most likely Mo Brooks, they get to run away laughing because Judge Mehta said that even though Giuliani said things like “Trial by Combat“, that Rudy was only kidding? That he didn’t really mean it even though that is exactly what transpired? I guess Mehta is also a mind-reader in this no-kidding aspect! As even speculation would not render this spectacle as fathomable.  Like the title of my “Opinion” this Amit Mehta “opinion” reeks with “conjecture” and something you would not expect out of a seasoned bench warmer - as Mehta is not seasoned when it comes to Patriotism - not his fault, it is what it is welcome to America!

Accordingly, Mehta’s decision in dismissing Giuliani and Donald Jr. away from the “civil” litigation is based on the Falloppio approach , the condom protection effect - that we know there was sex but protected; “None of their words, explicitly or implicitly, rose to the level of a call for imminent use of violence or lawless action.” Then just what the fuck was it? If Giuliani telling a maddening crowd in “Let’s have trial by combat.” is now acceptable…it was a precipice an element in “Treason” that is the reason the “Courts” may not be the best venue to arrest this “directing and aiding and abetting ASSAULT”. Yet even though Mehta lets Rudy and Jr. off the hook, he claims they were accomplices in the “Conspiracy” in fact that “directing and aiding and abetting ASSAULT”; “Giuliani and Trump Jr. aided the President in the foregoing efforts. They coordinated with him, spread similar disinformation, contacted state and local election officials, and agreed to speak at the January 6 Rally.” Like I am trying to get the point across, this is indeed a Mobius Strip “opinion”! Guilty maybe, NOT guilty maybe!

And in the final inning of Mehta’s very own insurrection on Democracy’s inevitable jurisprudence, the fact that even though there was established in fact a “conspiracy”, that Donald John Trump is free and clear. He cannot be held accountable for defecting, defecating, dereliction in conviction of duty in “failure-to-act” whatever in doing nothing to prevent it from ever happening in the first place or while it was in progress, even though he planned it, using Rudy and others as accomplices.

President Trump is immune as to Swalwell’s failure-to-act claim under § 1986. But the President cannot be held liable for his failure to exercise his presidential powers, at least under § 1986. Just as he is immune for acts that fall within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities, so too must he be immune for alleged failures to exercise that official responsibility. Were it otherwise, Presidents routinely would be subject to suit for not doing more or for not acting at all. Absolute immunity would be gutted if a plaintiff could avoid it simply by alleging a failure to exercise presidential power. The court therefore dismisses Swalwell’s § 1986 claim.

If Swalwell contends that President Trump is liable under § 1986 because he himself is an alleged coconspirator and had the power to stop the conspiracy, the court is dubious that § 1986 can sustain such a construction. If accepted, it would mean that any coconspirator of a § 1985 conspiracy with some degree of authority is likewise liable under § 1986. The court is skeptical that Congress intended such an interpretation. In any event, Swalwell does not specifically articulate a reading of § 1986 that would rest on the President’s failure to act before the rally-goers stormed the Capitol.

Dubious my Patriotic ass. And this BS that the court is skeptical over what Congress intended, look does not Congress make the laws not the “conjecture jesters”? This is blasphemy upon jurisprudence.

And that is wherein the U.S. Congress is blowing it with this January 6^th ordeal and we know one thing for sure, lawyers are cashing in, as there are too damn many lawsuits along with too damn many Judges too damn many lawyers involved, and that amounts to chaos in the “Crazy Psycho Shit” legal debates. And for real, how can a sitting U.S. District Judge offer up a “bribe”? See, Mo Brooks was the only defendant that did not file any motions to dismiss his defendant status upon the Eric Swalwell case. As Brooks is a sitting member of Congress and tested the waters that his status allowed for a certification under the Westfall Act, that when he incited a riot he was acting within the scope and merits of his obligation as a member of Congress - that what he accomplished was within the framework of his duties as is found in the GOP House Rules under “Legitimate Political Discourse”. And instead of trying to bail out, the Westfall Act allows Uncle Sam to come to the aid and rescue of government officials, wherein in the Swalwell lawsuit Mo Brooks’ name would be replaced by “United States” and then Uncle Sam would have to - yes it would mean the Merrick Garland DOJ would be litigating against a member of Congress, that was trying to sue Donald Trump and Giuliani and Donald Jr. and Mo Brooks for “Treason”. It is getting ugly, as Judge Mehta has asked Mo Brooks to now file a motion for dismissal, as Mehta does not want to entertain the merits of Mo Brook’s Westfall Act assertion. So it remains to be seen what Kevin McCarthy does with this golden opportunity. I mean a bribe can get the judge tossed and get the entirety of the lawsuits dismissed, just what Donald Trump would love to see than file a motion for “Attorney Fees” inflated by the Trump Tower highway robbery going rate.

And even if the 3-lawsuits continue on without Rudy without Donald Jr. and maybe soon without Brooks, Mehta’s decision stole the thunder and gave a gift of gag to the remaining defendant, namely Donald John Trump. In his opinion, that the plaintiffs had reached too far to hold Trump accountable in the fact it was a conspiracy, never was the latter ever denied by the Court, that fact was confirmed by Judge Mehta, but Donald Trump was not derelict to not try and STOP it! And wait there’s more. Mr. Trump is the remaining litigant besides the Pound Foolish Boys, who are still somewhere on the roster. And this ruling, that Trump excited a “conspiracy” that excited a riot but is immune from being held accountable, he now has the luxury of asking for protection under that “Westfall Act” and it appears that the Judge Mehta has paved the way for that request to succeed in the future. Trump has not yet asked the DOJ to certify his actions under the Westfall Act for a reason, the one Judge Mehta seems afraid of, as time is on the Donald’s side. Trump has until the day before the trial begins to exercise that option and we know wherein the DOJ stands with that “Act”, it will not allow any standing to violate the protection that “Act” allows even for a former President, including Donald John Trump.

So this lawsuit may be a big nothingburger and will indeed harm the attempt to hold Donald John Trump responsible for that “Domestic Terrorist Attack”. And then we ask ourselves, of course Giuliani and Donald. Jr. and Mo Brooks a maybe, they can file a motion for legal fees now that Judge Mehta as dismissed their action as accomplices in the most frightening day ever targeting the decency of Democracy…those that have been provided 1^st Amendment Right protection for “Treason”.

But who to blame the fact we cannot shoot straight any longer? Simple Simon answer as we have a Coward and disgraceful Congress. And to add insult to injury, when of course we get this fabricated bull-shit from a sitting law abiding judge that bases all opines on precedence set - but we never had an “Insurrection” like what occurred on January 6^th. Dear Amit, THERE IS NO PRESEDENCE! Please STOP making all this electric kool-aid acrid crap up!

This is not “regular business” my friends! So the Court should disrobe, for anything that smells of an “Insurrection”. The only Court, the only bench that should be addressing the January 6^th “DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACK” in its entirety civil to criminal is that of Congress. Yes, Congress has the divided power - either onto the House or Senate - to hold trial under “Congressional Inherent Contempt” legislation, which allows for bench warrants and arrests warrants to be issued and then the Sergeant-at-Arms can “Attach” individuals that defy the wishes of Congress. It would at least get the Truth out of the Morons. Speak up in honesty or forever hold your peace behind bars. Why is it so hard to see what is going on all around US?

In another episode, that which may have been instrumental in tainting the Mehta bench, because this Amit Mehta “Opinion” is disgraceful any semblance of Patriotism for “We the People”, well just recently the Supreme Court ruled against Donald Trump in a short-lived victory for Democracy - as it was but for only the time being a “win”. The Supremes, under the Falloppio condom of Baby Brett Kavanaugh, it ruled that Trump could not claim “Executive Privilege” just now, as in its “Opine” in an 9-1 decision, it also ventured where no lawman had ventured before - which is a Gran Tarantula win for Trump. And maybe we are starting to see the side effects of that High Court’s jurisdiction already with the Mehta verdict that allowed individuals that planned a “Terrorist’s Attack” off the hook and recommending that Donald John Trump did not violate his dereliction in that “failed-to-act” duty. In the Kavanaugh verdict, came the call that the action of the lower court in Trump’s "Executive Privilege” case was not a “binding” decision. Nor that it would be considered “precedence set” moving forward, that a former President does indeed have such a luxury in privilege and this “WARNING” was a shot across the bow to all the lower courts! Which means, well it appears that Patriotism has been tamed by Treason for the time being.

So this “Conjecture Opinion” by Judge Amit Mehta, it leaves Donald Trump as the remaining defendant, who is already “Not Guilty” and maybe bankrupt so what’s the point?

Highlights of Judge Amit Mehta’s “Conjecture Opinion”:

42 U.S.C. SECTION § 1985 safeguards federal officials and employees against conspiratorial acts directed at preventing them from performing their duties. It provides: If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties. The statute, in short, proscribes conspiracies that, by means of force, intimidation, or threats, prevent federal officers from discharging their duties or accepting or holding office. A party injured by such a conspiracy can sue any coconspirator to recover damages.

Section 1985(1) is a conspiracy statute, and so pleading a plausible conspiracy is an essential element of all Plaintiffs’ § 1985(1) claims. “A civil conspiracy is defined as an agreement between two or more people to participate in an unlawful act or a lawful act in an unlawful manner.” The agreement can be either express or tacit It is enough “that members of the conspiracy in some way or manner, or through some contrivance, positively or tacitly, to a mutual understanding to try to accomplish a common and unlawful plan.”

Before assessing the sufficiency of Plaintiffs’ pleadings, it is important to bear in mind what the alleged unlawful conspiracy is and what it is not. It is not that Defendants conspired to sow doubt and mistrust about the legitimacy of the electoral process and results of the 2020 presidential election. Nor is it that Defendants worked together to influence, pressure, or coerce local officials, members of Congress, and the Vice President to overturn a lawful election result. Though many Americans might view such conduct to be undemocratic or far worse, neither example is an actionable conspiracy under § 1985(1). The conspiracy alleged is that Defendants agreed “to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat,” (1) Swalwell and the Bass Plaintiffs from discharging their duties in certifying the results of the presidential election and (2) the President elect and Vice President–elect from “accepting or holding” their offices. It is this conspiracy that Plaintiffs must plausibly establish through well-pleaded facts. The court begins with a detailed summary of those facts and then, assuming those facts to be true, assesses their sufficiency as to each coconspirator.

Viewing the foregoing well-pleaded facts in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs, and drawing all reasonable inferences in their favor, the court concludes that the Complaints establish a plausible § 1985(1) conspiracy involving President Trump. That civil conspiracy included the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, Tarrio, and others who entered the Capitol on January 6th with the intent to disrupt the Certification of the Electoral College vote through force, intimidation, or threats.

Giuliani and Trump Jr. aided the President in the foregoing efforts. They coordinated with him, spread similar disinformation, contacted state and local election officials, and agreed to speak at the January 6 Rally.

The court reaches a different conclusion as to Giuliani. There is little doubt that Plaintiffs have adequately pleaded that Giuliani was involved in a conspiracy to “engage in a months-long misinformation campaign to convince Trump’s supporters that the election had been illegally stolen.”  But, as the court stated earlier, such a conspiracy does not violate § 1985(1). What Plaintiffs must plausibly establish is that Giuliani conspired to prevent Congress from discharging its duties on January 6th by force, intimidation, or threat. There, they fall short. In addition to his pre–January 6th actions—which alone do not establish Giuliani as a § 1985(1) conspirator—Plaintiffs point to two of Giuliani’s acts that occurred on January 6th: (1) his rally speech, in which he said, “So, let’s have trial by combat” and “We’re going to fight to the very end to make sure that doesn’t happen,” and (2) a phone call that he made to members of Congress, urging them to delay the Certification. These allegations, individually and taken together, do not “nudge” Plaintiffs’ § 1985(1) claim against Giuliani “across the line from conceivable to plausible.” As to his rally remarks, the court believes Giuliani’s words are not enough to make him part of a § 1985(1) conspiracy. Critically, Giuliani uttered no words that resembled a call to action. “Trial by combat” was not accompanied by a direction to do anything. And, given the speaker, those words were not likely to move the crowd to act. There is no allegation that anyone took Giuliani’s words as permission to enter the Capitol. And there are no allegations that Giuliani at any time before January 6th uttered words advocating or inspiring violence. Indeed, as discussed further below, the court holds that Giuliani’s rally remarks are constitutionally protected speech. Nor is Giuliani alleged to have been involved in rally planning or known that the President would direct the crowd to march to the Capitol. And he did not express solidarity with the rally-goers after some violently assaulted police and forced their way into the Capitol. Giuliani’s words at the rally are not sufficiently additive to make him a § 1985(1) coconspirator. Neither are his phone calls to lawmakers on January 6th after the Capitol was breached. Whatever the timing of those calls, they at most establish Giuliani as an opportunist, not someone who shared in the same general conspiratorial objective as others before the violence at the Capitol occurred. Though Giuliani unquestionably was a central figure in the President’s efforts to sow doubt and mistrust in the election’s outcome, the court cannot say, based on the facts alleged, that he plausibly shared the common conspiratorial goal of violently disrupting the Certification.

The court reaches the same conclusion as to Trump Jr. The allegations against him are even thinner than those against Giuliani. Before January 6th, he sent false and misleading tweets about the election and publicly criticized officials who did not support his father. He also spoke at the rally, during which he repeated false claims about election fraud and theft. He also warned Republicans who failed to back the President, “we’re coming for you, and we’re gonna have a good time doing it.” As discussed below, the court believes these words to be protected speech. That is all Plaintiffs have attributed to Trump Jr. He is not alleged to have participated in rally planning, known that the President would direct a march to the Capitol, or expressed support for the rioters and their actions. The allegations against Trump Jr. are insufficient to make him a coconspirator in a plan to disrupt Congress from performing its duties.

At this point in time, the Judge Mehta’s opinion is to call out Donald John Trump as the “only” government conspirator and provide “conspiratorial amnesty” to Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump Jr.

Plaintiffs advance other claims, as well. Swalwell alleges a violation of § 1986, a companion provision to § 1985. 42 U.S.C. § 1986. That statute makes a person in a position of power who knows about a conspiracy prohibited by § 1985, and who neglects or refuses to take steps to prevent such conspiracy, liable to a person injured by the conspiracy. Swalwell claims that President Trump, Trump Jr., Giuliani, and Brooks violated § 1986 by refusing to act to prevent the violence at the Capitol.

The foregoing comes with one important caveat: President Trump is immune as to Swalwell’s failure-to-act claim under § 1986. That provision states: Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned [in section 1985 of this title], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented. The statutory provision is unique. It requires persons with knowledge of a conspiracy proscribed in § 1985 and with the means to prevent the conspiracy to take affirmative actions to do so. A person who refuses or neglects to exercise such power is liable for damages to those persons whose injuries could have been prevented. Swalwell alone asserts a claim under § 1986 against President Trump. He alleges that President Trump knew about the alleged § 1985 conspiracy, had the power to prevent it, and failed to exercise “reasonable diligence” to avoid harm. But the President cannot be held liable for his failure to exercise his presidential powers, at least under § 1986. Just as he is immune for acts that fall within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities, so too must he be immune for alleged failures to exercise that official responsibility. Were it otherwise, Presidents routinely would be subject to suit for not doing more or for not acting at all. Absolute immunity would be gutted if a plaintiff could avoid it simply by alleging a failure to exercise presidential power. The court therefore dismisses Swalwell’s § 1986 claim.

If Swalwell contends that President Trump is liable under § 1986 because he himself is an alleged coconspirator and had the power to stop the conspiracy, the court is dubious that § 1986 can sustain such a construction. If accepted, it would mean that any coconspirator of a § 1985 conspiracy with some degree of authority is likewise liable under § 1986. The court is skeptical that Congress intended such an interpretation. In any event, Swalwell does not specifically articulate a reading of § 1986 that would rest on the President’s failure to act before the rally-goers stormed the Capitol.

At this point in time, the Judge Mehta’s opinion states that Donald John Trump is the “only” government conspirator" left, but rest asured cannot be held liable for his failures! Maybe Metha fell asleep, maybe he farted, but for sure he defecated on "My Country 'Tis of Thee" as jurisprudence Patriotism is MIA. Case Closed.

Judge Mehta's Select Committee

Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON as Chairman - famous for “Must Respect the Institution” even if Part and Parcel Guilty and known to have suffered from “Emotional Distress” due the effects of “Crazy Psycho Shit” and LIZ CHENEY as “Vice Chair”(but not the minority leader due legitimate political discourse), along with ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, ADAM KINZINGER as “Rank & File Members” on the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the United States Capitol, along with the FOUR missing-formation members in vacancy status;

Not meaning to sound funny, but Nancy Pelosi did not take me up on my Patriotic suggestion, that I be awarded one of the missing formation vacancies with this “Committee” so that it was then starting to conform to the “letter of the law”. OK just remember laughter is still the best of medicines! But it appears this “Committee” will soon be a laughing-stock Marjorie Soylent Greene jock-strap Jim Jordan joke if Mark Meadows prevails in his lawsuit. Look, I am not betting on Speaker Pelosi in that duel, as it sure seems to be following that Cicilline “Crazy Psycho Shit” philanthropy! So just a reminder before signing off for good as my new book titled “My TRY TIP Recipe Book for Bennie” is in the final draft, and likewise with this “Committee” needing more time to answer the Nichol’s “Court”, well me to too busy “in light of their schedules and official travel.” Especially now that new “subpoenas” being issued will again postpone some more any “Public Hearings”, why has not this “Committee” issued a “Subpoena” for any member of Congress nor served Donald John Trump wherein service is due, way overdue? Especially after District Judge Amit Mehta most recently allowed amnesty for Rudy and Donald Jr. and almost pardoned the 45^th! I am sure they are laughing in the scary fact that their January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” free-speech was protected even though they were mentioned as an accomplice to Donald Trump’s “conspiracy act” plan to overthrow Congress. That is what happens with Trump appointed trash. So it appears with that “opinion” your “investigation” and our “investment” just got a whole lot easier under consideration - as there is but for a single rodent left to subpoena. And for real, Donald as former “President Trump is immune as to failure-to-act”?  Wow, this makes the “Select Committee’s” job super-duper easy, just pack up and go home. It means there is nothing left, the Judge just said Trump is “immune” and if it works under the merits of “exciting a riot” it will work everywhere else, as Mehta is quoted; “But the President cannot be held liable for his failure to exercise his presidential powers, at least under § 1986. Were it otherwise, Presidents routinely would be subject to suit for not doing more or for not acting at all. Absolute immunity would be gutted if a plaintiff could avoid it simply by alleging a failure to exercise presidential power. If Swalwell contends that President Trump is liable under § 1986 because he himself is an alleged coconspirator and had the power to stop the conspiracy, the court is dubious that § 1986 can sustain such a construction. If accepted, it would mean that any coconspirator of a § 1985 conspiracy with some degree of authority is likewise liable under § 1986. The court is skeptical that Congress intended such an interpretation. In any event, Swalwell does not specifically articulate a reading of § 1986 that would rest on the President’s failure to act before the rally-goers stormed the Capitol.” So nice that a judge did the leg work for the Congress in this “skeptical” reasoning and if that be not the case then someone should call Mehta to the carpet on this - maybe subpoena the judge! And how is it that this judge can get away with impersonating a Supreme Court Justice, as his reasoning is not for the lower-courts to decide in the “intent of Congress”, so this “opinion” begs of “part and parcel guilty” in disrespect to the institution. If this is another “smoke screen” tactic that but for “must respect the institution”, reason to believe Chairman Thompson really meant that “Crazy Psycho Shit” institution finds preferential treatment. Sorry, but I searched every damn Congressional publication since 1789, cannot find wherein this “respect for the institution” finds its merits in establishment. Maybe it was made up on the fly, but it is meaningless in the U.S. Constitution as that being true, this “respect” it would mean DEMOCRACY in its grave already. So in “Legitimate Political Discourse 101”, herein is what it spells out in your own damn Portnoy’s Complaint pocket-addition of the “House of Representatives Rules”. And before Trump gets protection under the Westfall Act, act now and subpoena the rodent. Sad though, that this “Committee” is afraid, cowards more like it, to not use what is necessary to get…it was an INSURRECTION, a “DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACK” by a sitting Commander-in-Chief, what is it that this “Committee” fails to understand, as “We the People” are not STUPID and as we speak the Rudy Giulianis and Donald Jrs. and the Mo Brooks are dead beating it away to freedom!

RULES of the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS
February 2, 2021
Rule XI, clause 2 - Subpoena Power

Subpoena power (m)(1) - For the purpose of carrying out any of its functions and duties under this rule and rule X (including any matters referred to it under clause 2 of rule XII), a committee or subcommittee is authorized (B) to require, by subpoena or otherwise, the attendance and testimony of such witnesses and the production of such books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and documents as it considers necessary.(D) Subpoenas for documents or testimony may be issued to any person or entity, whether governmental, public, or private, within the United States, including, but not limited to, the President, and the Vice President, whether current or former, in a personal or official capacity, as well as the White House, the Office of the President, the Executive Office of the President, and any individual currently or formerly employed in the White House, Office of the President, or Executive Office of the President.

And wait there is more of this “Crazy Psycho Shit”, as then “We the People” find under the same House of Representatives “Rules”:

RULE VIII RESPONSE TO SUBPOENAS

1. (a) When a Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House is properly served with a judicial subpoena or order, such Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee shall comply, consistently with the privileges and rights of the House, with the judicial subpoena or order as hereinafter provided, unless otherwise determined under this rule. (b) For purposes of this rule, ‘‘judicial subpoena or order’’ means a judicial subpoena or judicial order directing appearance as a witness relating to the official functions of the House or for the production or disclosure of any document relating to the official functions of the House.

Let’s face the facts, the stubbornness of this “Committee” in refusal to “Subpoena” the Donald and the Jim Jordans some 230 days gone bye-bye by now, with lame excuses “we do not know what we are doing”, well remember most of us learned it all in kindergarten - how to understand rules! Since when did “We the People” give the Congress the legitimacy to make up rules that don’t exist?

Please STOP blowing smoke up our you know what - as this Patriotic Democrat is starting to see that this “Committee” is more interested in Image over Country!

And when Nancy Pelosi was experiencing a “Bad Hair Day” or maybe the fallout from excessive private gallivanting jet lag, Pelosi cut Bennie Thompson’s H.Res.3233 to smithereens - which was an excellent resolution to form a “Committee” for opening up an “investigation” into the January 6^th event, as it was the roadmap of necessity and success. And when the “smithereens” went pasted back together to form some semblance of “crap legislation”, those pieces of the puzzle in chaos now an abortion found a romance as H.Res.503, well wherein does it say this “Committee” can hold “Public Hearings”? It cannot, the only wiggle room is for this “Committee” to finish that report and close up shop, so take this as a Cease & Desist, DO NOT waste the Taxpayers hard-earned income taxed for a talent show, as that is no different then the Moron’s attempt to “Steal the Steal”. In ending forever, good luck with what started out as a “Good Faith” effort to hold those accountable for that “DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACK”, that investigation now turned into some idiotic excuse that the “Select Committee” must abide by the senile sanitized notion in “must respect the institution” and local judges deciding that they think they know what is best for the Congress in its fight for Democracy. Thanks for trying, but in the end it appears that something has gotten in the way of “do solemnly swear that I will bear true faith and allegiance…so help me God.” and that means “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” in its Founding Fathers’ DEMOCRACY is still under ATTACK and thus we are all in the same vote, both democrats and republicans, with “part and parcel guilty”. GOOD-BYE!

Stugots - The Lousy Hat Solidarity Party

PS: Free copies of “My TRY TIP Recipe Book for Bennie” will be provided to the “Select Committee” members when publication begins. Enjoy! 

HELP WANTED

HELP WANTED - This is an opportunity of a lifetime, a time to come to the aid of your Country, in a bipartisan Patriotic way - either as a “Crazy Psycho Shit” Democrat or a “Legitimate Political Discourse” Republican! Maybe you would never consider throwing your good name away getting involved in the Washington political scene for a career, but herein is a position wherein you can temporality try out the “cesspool”! No commitments! Yes indeed, in opportunity to experience what members of the Nancy LousyLollaPelosi's House of Representatives enjoys day-in day-out. And wait there’s more, NO QUALIFICATIONS necessary! Right now, there are 4-positions requiring your expertise, which can be anything to help out, as the bipartisan - meaning the “Crazy Psycho Shit” side of the aisle and the “Legitimate Political Discourse” other side of the aisle of right - this “so happy together” again finds the “Select Committee” Investigating the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol with roll-call “Vacancies”! And with such, it cannot fulfill its “mission”! And it does not matter your political side, even if you wear a Marjorie Soylent Greene jockstrap or Jim Jordan leak-proof panties, whatever your fancy, this opportunity may be that once-in-a-lifetimer. IMAGINE telling your grandkids that you were part of this “Committee”, with the likes of Adam Schiff and Jamie Raskin and Zoe Lofgren, all seasoned impeachment managers that paved the way for the acquittal of Donald John Trump! So act now, contact Nancy at 202-225-4965 with promotion code 503 and offer up your services. She may take you up on your willingness and in appreciation your Patriotism in gratuity a ham sandwich. If no answer, please try back at a later date, as sometimes due a “Bad Hair Day” the phones are not answered. If no luck getting through, as time is of the essence for this “Committee” getting fully up to par with staff infection “composition”, you can also contact Head-Cheese Bennie at 202-225-5876 with inquiries, but this contact may not work either, due to interference by “emotional distress” signals.

Volunteer of AMERICA

To: Nancy Pelosi, House Speaker of the 117^th House of Representatives
Subject: House Resolution 503 - Vacancies
Date: February 17^th, 2022

Urgency: CRITICAL - Immediate Attention Required

CC. BENNIE G. THOMPSON “Chairman” and LIZ CHENEY “Vice Chair”, along with, ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, ADAM KINZINGER as “Rank & File Members” on the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the United States Capitol;

Dear House Speaker Nancy Pelosi;

Due the fact that “vacancies” exist on the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol, and since by now some 230 days have past wherein this “Committee’s” roster is in violation of House Resolution 503 as is found under SEC. 2. COMPOSITION: (c) Vacancies.—Any vacancy in the Select Committee shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment., I offer a Patriotic solution. Since it appears that the “vacancies” have not been accommodated through the “filled in the same manner as the original appointment”, most likely due to “Legitimate Political Discourse”, well as a forever “Volunteer of America” along with my New England Patriot “Duty to Country” I am ready and willing to accept the challenge - to fill one of the vacancies. If qualifications are in question, unlike Bennie Thompson’s original resolution 3233 that held a vast array of requirements, 503 finds none, so I am qualified. Pay can be negotiated but within the merits of SEC. 6. RECORDS; STAFF; TRAVEL; FUNDING: (d) Use Of Consultants Permitted.—Section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 shall apply with respect to the Select Committee in the same manner as such section applies with respect to a standing committee of the House of Representatives and as was found in 3233, may be compensated at not to exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay in effect for a position at level III of the Executive Schedule under 5314 of Title 5 USC. Or if pay is an issue, a ham sandwich will suffice. Please take this recommendation under serious consideration, that which starts to fulfill the roster/vacancy requirements of your resolution and I believe having an outsider on the “Committee” more then ever today is sound enrichment for “We the People”. Thanks.

Stugots Scoregge nella mia testa - Lousy Hat Solidarity Party 

Pelosi - Another Bad Hair Day!

Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON “Chairman” and LIZ CHENEY “Vice Chair”, along with, ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, ADAM KINZINGER as “Rank & File Members” on the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the United States Capitol, along with the missing-in-action members in vacancy status;

A 14-day extension for the “Committee Members” to answer to the Meadows v. Pelosi complaint? In excuse “in light of their schedules and official travel”? For real, then may I suggest less time on the Rachal Madcow hour! What are you trying to hide, as is not time of the essence in this “investigation”? Beginning to believe this additional time, as so with the Trump v. Thompson time extension, it is due the fact this “Committee” is floundering. Just an honest assessment of what it looks like from the outside, when trying to stay on the side of Democracy and would like to continue support for this Committee’s “investigation”, but what is going on? If there is nothing to hide by the “Committee” and or Pelosi in the Meadows’ case, then STOP this harassing of “We the People”, just answer the complaint timely so we can then see how Judge Nichols views the “merits” of the case. Then again if Pelosi had a “bad hair day” and allowed the violation of the “composition” of H.Res.503, and the “Committee Chair” went along with it, then maybe it best time to cut the losses. Yes, abandon the efforts. It is wonderful all the evidence the “Committee” has so far collected and it appears bragging rights every night makes us confident the “investigation” is still meaningful, but what good is it if Meadows’ case is not dismissed? Why are there still “vacancies” in the “Select Committee” roster, when the language of 503 is specific in that “Shall”? It appears Mr. Meadows has a very strong case, and if he prevails, well maybe that DOJ “referral” is moot - is that why the “Committee” wants to extend things? And could it be that Merrick Garland’s DOJ cannot, will not rule on the Mark Meadows’ “Criminal Contempt” referral from House Speaker Pelosi until such time this “Select Committee” and Nancy Pelosi with “respect to the institution” find the time to prioritize what is, well a priority? It appears this “Committee” is now stalling to buy time, not what “We the People” would have expected from a Democratic sponsored “Committee” with a mission to get to the bottom of how Donald John Trump was responsible for the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol.  So why the “water-boarding”? So let me answer the court for Pelosi and this “Committee” in a 1,2, 3 strikes you’re out!

According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s House Resolution 503, that which was the foundation for the “Select Committee”, it SHALL:

SEC. 2. COMPOSITION.

(a) Appointment Of Members.—The Speaker shall appoint 13 Members to the Select Committee, 5 of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the minority leader.

(b) Designation Of Chair.—The Speaker shall designate one Member to serve as chair of the Select Committee.

(c) Vacancies.—Any vacancy in the Select Committee shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.

Yes your honor, we never convened a full posse! Nancy had a bad hair day and Bennie suffers from “emotional distress”, so we have engaged in a disregard of minority rights. Case Closed. Why cannot this “Committee” begin to come honest with “We the People” that due stubbornness, that this “Committee” may be in serious jeopardy to continue on, as Judge Nichols will not find any amusement in a Congress that does not follow its own “rules”. So just give it up, be honest with the Court and admit that this “Committee” is not a “Committee” and then “We the People” will find an understanding how with Pelosi it was IMAGE before Country!

Stugots, Lousy Hat Solidarity Party

-and for reference:

On the motion filed February 15^th, 2021, in Meadows v. Pelosi:

CONSENT MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Pursuant to Local Rule 7 and the Court’s Standing Order for Civil Cases (ECF No. 4), Defendants the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, the Honorable Bennie G. Thompson, the Honorable Elizabeth L. Cheney, the Honorable Adam B. Schiff, the Honorable Jamie B. Raskin, the Honorable Susan E. Lofgren, the Honorable Elaine G. Luria, the Honorable Peter R. Aguilar, the Honorable Stephanie Murphy, the Honorable Adam D. Kinzinger, and the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol move for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Plaintiff Mark Meadows filed his Complaint (ECF No. 1) on December 8, 2021. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(3), the response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is currently due on February 18, 2022, 60 days after service of the summons and original complaint on the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. See ECF No. 7; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(3). Defendants seek a 14-day extension of the deadline to respond to the Complaint, until March 4, 2022.

Defendants, all Members of Congress, are actively engaged in studying the various alternatives in the litigation and need more time, in light of their schedules and official travel, prior to responding.

Trump's Presidential SCIF

 

Nancy Pelosi - A Bad Hair Day

Mark your calendar, as February 18^th, 2022, is a pivotal date and could be remembered in history as the “Nancy Pelosi Bad Hair Day Extraordinaire”. For real, just 4-days away. Look, did House Speaker Nancy LousyLollaPelosi mess it all up for Democracy? Yes in a “Bad Hair Day” moment, maybe aided and abetted through sustained jet lag and a “Crazy Psycho Shit” House to contend with not to forget a bunch of GOP Turncoats. Surely not a formula for success!

The Scooby-doo Scoop: When “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” was still recovering from the morning after putrid stench left behind from defecating punks of the Moron, that January 6^th Marjorie Soylent Greene gazpacho thing that proved one all-important reality that we never should have shut down the “Insane Asylums” - hold that thought! But maybe worse off then that so help me God my “Founding Fathers” Democracy, what appears to be a treacherous abandoning by Pelosi, that which was addressed in the heading of this dissertation. Maybe this jeopardizing of a Democracy wounded, when she was too busy getting a hair-blow-job or private jet gallivanting excursions, even with Mr. COvid keeping most of us in “lockdown” mode. Well praytell we may soon find out a new meaning of “dereliction”, as by next Friday we will see if the Mark Meadows’ not guilty “strategy” holds toilet water. OK, nothing to do with “guilty or not” just the fact that Meadows is giving Pelosi and her “Select Committee” a run for its monarchy. Yes, toilet water, in the sense the same damn water rights Donald Trump claims for his “above the law” cesspool attitude. See, I am not a Mark Meadows fan, neither would I be held accountable to NOT give Donald Trump “Good Samaritan” life support if by chance I was nearby, and he was choking while trying to eat the evidence - talk about the dog ate my homework. OK, if I were around the corner and there was a nearby toilet plunger I may attempt resuscitation - Donald “open wide”! Imagine, the Commander-in-Thief choking on Jim Jordan’s edible panties, I meant Marjorie Soylent Greene’s “gazpacho” flavored jock-strap. But when you read the lawsuit that Mr. Meadows has before the District Court today, it is a good augment - matter in fact it is a solid augment in jurisprudence, to be concise that by next week we may see the dismantling of the “Select Committee investigating the January 6^th Domestic Terrorist Attack on the U.S. Capitol.” Or at least a time-out and then a “nothingburger” again, as legal challenges with the intent to stall things finds a ways and means to boredom, then all interest will wane away we are left with another useless like Impeachment #1 not to forget an Impeachment #2 wait there’s more. I am starting to feel sorry for Jamie Raskin and Adam Schiff and Zoe Lofgren, as those failures will become part of their resumes! Does 3-strikes make what a difference the day makes? But why so my concern over the wherewithal and survival of this “Select Committee” in this premeditated fact that in a few days we may hear screaming from the Capitol rotunda, when Pelosi looks in the mirror and sees just another “Bad Hair Day”? Because in haste, in waste of the Taxpayers’ hard-earned income burdened by Uncle Sam’s reputation for taxation, it means the menace that some can continue to play games because “accountability” is like a traffic light, just a suggestion to a drunk driver…OK, to begin with we start out with the Mark Meadows v. Nancy Pelosi and the Select Committee Members, it is paramount this discussion of what can cause that “Bad Hair Day”. This case is active before a district judge that once worked for Clarence Thomas and Carl Nichols was given the courtship by none other then, Donald John Trump! And Nichols is one tough gavel hailing justice. Now the Meadows’ suit claims two-things of mighty importance, the precipice for what could end up being a “Bad Hair Day” for Pelosi. First and foremost trying to gain attention and attraction before the “Court”, facts that suggest the “Select Committee” never convened per "the letter of the law”. So if Meadows’ case is convincing enough on this fact alone, it means everything Pelosi’s “Committee” has accomplished so far is moot, basically “null and void” for the time being. A time-out until such time it is officially convened in accordance with the House Resolution 503, that which granted gavel permission for the formation of this “Committee” to investigate the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on Democracy. This “resolution” was authorized by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. It was voted in by the House, in victory for the Democratic side of the aisle. But early on during the preliminary formation of this “Committee” with its membership, wherein it is of record under the “Composition” title that which specifies that there “Shall” be 13-members chosen from the House, wherein 5-members “Shall” to be chosen by the minority leader Kevin McCarthy, well it all fell apart even before the Pelosi signature-of-authority was even beginning to dry. Pelosi was not excited about having members nominated that voted against the resolution in the first place, because some of those named by McCarthy would then be involved in the active investigation into Donald John Trump’s knowledge of that plan, which culminated by a “Domestic Terrorist Attack”. Yes, it meant those in the know and “termites” of Trump conducting their own investigation, well it would be like talking to themselves in the Putin mirror that once assaulted the Oval Office wall - which is now down Mar-a-lago way as Melania the “Russian Spy” cannot live without it. So with that predicament in possibility, with guilty GOP members in the midst of a valid “investigation”, well Pelosi gaveled in her own members of the House from the GOP, namely Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger - the only republicans that had voted AYE for the 503 resolution. And by being so stubborn, well Pelosi fell into the GOP “trap”! As that was a death wish against the resolution the merits of its language - that “letter of the law” jurisdiction! Need to sway, Pelosi’s “Select Committee” found preferential treatment in the “Select” category, against the wishes of the “resolution” itself and thus this must have “investigatory committee” started off with failure written all over it. Now cannot change horses in midstream either, as then Representative Bennie Thompson was awarded the “Chair”, when at the same time he had a personal lawsuit against Donald Trump, for an action asking for $compensatory$ and $punitive damages$ for the harm suffered by “emotional distress” from that January 6^th affair. Requesting a “jury award” which can sometimes mean $millions$. Now Thompson did recuse himself away from that court action when he was assigned to the “Select Committee”, but that does not necessarily mean the “emotional distress” was left behind! And when the “Select Committee” started to explore to expose, when Thompson’s gavel was heard that the “Select Committee” had convened, it was not set-up according to the merits of the original House Resolution 503, so it was premature to convene. There were vacancies, still today, and the “resolution” called for No Vacancies, to convene only when there was a full roster of 13-members, NOT 9 and how it stands today in limbo, with guidelines for “Shall” filling those vacancies! It meant 3-times this “Shall” condition the make-up of the “Select Committee”, not could, not a maybe, but…just ask a lawyer the significance of this “shall” doctrine! It was that proverbial 3-strikes you’re out and Meadows being a seasoned member of Congress, well he understood what it meant to then use that verdict to his advantage. So in reality all things considered “Congressional”, there is found no excuse to stray away from the original House Resolution and now the “Court” is involved. And that is the Mark Meadows’ defense, that the “Committee” was not performing within the obligation of the original resolution and there came no “amendments” otherwise - like would be the “norm” when lawmakers through legislation must intervene to change things - that would have then allowed a posse of 9 to fulfill the “mission” and get on with the “investigation”. An “amendment” was required, even though it may have then come under protest by the McCarthy GOP, but there is a mechanism in place with the House that must be used to address such concerns. Pelosi blew it, as she reneged on the deal and did not bother to convene the “House” to amend the 503 Resolution! Instead, it was a premature nothing! Today, the Mark Meadows case is at the stage wherein it requires Pelosi and Thompson to answer in argument the complaint by Friday the 18^th, as to why the “Committee’s” roster found vacancies and no attempt to fill such as was required by the language of the resolution - as the latter is the “law of the land” when it comes to the Congress in fulfilling its “Constitutional” obligation. With Pelosi, I think it is called heresy, maybe dereliction in the conviction! What’s at stake for Democracy? How do you convince a judge to rule against the Meadows’ case when the “Committee” was not following its own rules - it wasn’t “case closed”! Yes, due a “Bad Hair Day” as Pelosi knows better so many maybe too many years in the Congress, well in “stubbornness” the Speaker may have ruined the so-far merits of the “Select Committee” as the judge could easily rule that it is not yet a “convened” Committee. Thus, it has no basis to perform any sort of investigatory work. I hear the pound of the gavel, go home until such time those vacancies are filled, in the meantime all the served subpoenas are null and void! Which means the Mark Meadows’ “criminal contempt” referral before the DOJ is also dismissed. Same with the Steve Bannon thing. Same with the John Eastman escapades that is close to a “contempt referral” not to mention all the rest of Trump’s minions that will line up and kissing Meadows’ ass. Yes, crooks and crocks still on the loose! Look, “everybody's talking at me - I don't hear a word they're saying - only the echoes of my mind” that Meadows’ “referral” and so many pundits questioning why Mr. Garland has been so damn quiet, still so silent after some 60-days still not committed to publicly holding Meadows in “criminal contempt” - it is because of the Meadows’ lawsuit don’t need a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows! And this is something the “Select Committee” is afraid to be transparent about, as no doubt the members have by now read the Meadows’ lawsuit and right about now Pelosi and Thompson are shitting heart shaped bricks for Valentine’s Day! They may have blown it! And when the “Select Committee” started sending out those subpoenas like red-hots like it was the Valentine’s Day Massacre, well there came the scare and in challenge that individuals-of-interest would just claim the 5^th. Which is allowed as a defense against “self-incrimination”, it does not mean “guilt”, but then Mr. Thompson had a fit of explosive diarrhea and called the use of the 5^th “part and parcel guilty”. And that is when Mr. Meadows decided to fight fire with fire. A person in the “Chair” position should realize when to keep one’s mouth shut. And here we are, everyone still in wonder that after so many days gone bye-bye since the “Select Committee” made a “criminal contempt” referral to the DOJ about Mr. Meadows’ “NO SHOW” for his subpoena deposition, why Merrick Garland remains so silent - because Meadows was smart and filed the lawsuit before Thompson’s referral hit the doorsteps of the DOJ. So now time is on the Meadow’s camp side, and depending on the outcome, it could find a trickle-down theory that wipes clean the slate any so far evidence gathering by the “Committee”. And even when Mr. Meadows was dragging his feet but still entertaining the “Select Committee’s” investigation, so was acting in some semblance of “faith” the jury still out whether in good or bad, Thompson secretly subpoenaed Meadows’ phone records. Which was not an act in “Good Faith” participation, and that is another argument before the court in this Meadows’ complaint. This is what will anger a judge more then anything else! And we now know all about that questionable gap in Trump’s phone logs on that January 6^th, well the Moron was using Meadows’ phone and with this lawsuit, it may dismiss that must have evidence that may then be placed off limits forever amen. So we had the goods on the pricks, we had more then enough evidence the ham sandwich is going to Sing-Sing for life X 10. But because of “bad hair days” along with “emotional distress”, the “Select Committee” may have been too damn antsy, as this was Adam Schiff and Jamie Raskins one last clear chance to prove themselves after two failed “Impeachments”. That guilt, it may have condoned an over-zealous calling with involvement in this “Select Committee”, and that may be what fails Democracy even more then that January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol. And wait there’s more in the bone of contention category, that which could further derail the “Select Committee” as “bad hair days” seem to have taken over the House like in vogue, yes in that “I Really Don’t Care Do U” sentiment now from Pelosi, as Mr. Meadows is still in argument that he must abide by the “Executive Privilege” set forth by his ex-boss. Now everybody thinks that the 1-0 8-0 convincing yet deceiving “opine” most recently issued from the Supreme Court put that concern to rest. It did not, matter of fact Jester Brett Kavanaugh made it clear and convincing that the only reason Trump was not allowed a “stay” wherein his presidential records should find some semblance of “confidentiality”, even as a former boss, it was based on the fact the appeals court eared in its judgement and based its “no executive privilege” decision on “dicta”. Another way of “Big Brother” calling out a laziness in the lower court’s ruling. Which means that it was not ruled upon within the merits of the case, it was too far reaching and that a President, a former “shall” enjoy the privilege. Accordingly, this shot across the bow by the Supreme Court speaks for itself, that a former president has the legitimacy upon the ability to continue to exercise that right of “Executive Privilege” regardless of what Joe Biden thinks. The ruling from the High Court was basically a warning, that next time any lower court gets to hear a case in appeal the legal consideration of “Executive Privilege”, that it must base its decision on the “merits” of the case - even if it is in the best interest for national security to give breathing room for this “dicta” reasoning. That it will not stand and look out if another similar case makes its way back to Kavanaugh, which we could see with the Meadows’ case. So that is what Mark Meadows is up to. He has the majority of the High Court on his side, especially Clarence Thomas. And the district judge that is hearing the Meadows case, to reiterate, he was a confident clerk for Thomas - and Thomas was the 1-0 in that landmark “Executive Privilege” decision that the court said was neither “binding” or would “set precedence”, even though it ruled against Donald Trump for this particular case. To reiterate, it was neither “binding” or “set precedence” for the lower courts, wherein Thomas was all for that Trump “privilege” still. That said, it was one of the few times the “High Court” has challenged its own merits on “precedence set” litigation. So when you put these things together before a judge that was a Trump appointee…good luck Nancy best schedule a hairdo! And it was stubbornness between Pelosi and McCarthy that has got us into this bind. Look McCarthy is too stupid to have planned this “trap”, it appears the democrats shot themselves in the foot! We know how baby Kevin works and in this case Pelosi should have taken the high road, she should have given in to the 5-candadites that McCarthy voted on as minority members of the “Select Committee”, as it did not amount to any concern as the composition of the “Committee” would then have still maintained a majority by members of the House that were Democrats in an 8 to 5 victory for Democracy. The “Select Committee” didn’t need the involvement of McCarthy’s trash in efforts to perform any valid investigation, but those named needed to be included in the roster before convening! So maybe Pelosi was having a “bad hair day”, and here we are at the cross-roads and it don’t look so good for those that thought we had Patriots on our side to get to the bottom of that “Domestic Terrorist Attack”. But rest assured, they are all selling book tours! And if we see that the lower courts give in and grant Mark Meadows a victory his day in court, that Donald Trump maintains “Executive Privilege” and that the ”Select Committee” has not yet legally convened, well rest assured that the lawyers have so far made a “killing” for nothing in return and it shows me that maybe, just maybe “emotional distress” has taken over “My Country ‘Tis of Thee’s DEMOCRACY” and when a “Bad Hair Day” confronts…blame it all on Nancy Pelosi and her pigsty IMAGE above Country, she gaveled away Democracy because that IMAGE was more important then “My Country ‘Tis of Thee”!

Lousy Hat Solidarity Party

Life's Rehearsal

 From our first breath in the wings of life’s stage, 

we rehearse for death do us part!

Is Putin’s Time Up?

So, T-minus very little, and it sounds like “bombs away” and Ukraine is under attack. But not so fast, as we must also realize that this is an opportune time for a Russian “coup d’etat” against Vladismear Vladimirobitch Putin.  Yes, the time for the “Workingman’s Blues” to take over, the party of the working men and women of Russia, those that believe the old ways and means are not what the Russian people want or deserve, as Putin is a phobic hoe foe! I can hear the workers singing to Dylan:

Meet me at the bottom, don't lag behind
Bring me my boots and shoes
You can hang back or fight your best on the front line
Sing a little bit of these workingman's blues

Well, I'm sailin' on back, ready for the long haul
Tossed by the winds and the seas
I'll drag 'em all down to hell and I'll stand 'em at the wall
I'll sell 'em to their enemies

Look, blood and guts and dead-burned babies and a ruined economy a war that could last forever, what good is it what does it prove if but for stupidity to redraw the Russian Federation map some more. And if that be the intent, well the aftermath of a bloody insurrection has to be dealt with by the conqueror! Else, well outside interests like NATO mobilize to feed and cloth the down and out, and the cycle begins all over again. Look Putin, you attack it you own it! And even if Putin did survive to get away with it, it would be but a short-lived victory as Ukrainians will find a path to get back to wherein they were before today, with some semblance of freedom. And the Russian people must be thinking the same thing, as it is well known that the Russian election system is rigged, and even though there was at one time a 2-term limit for a Russian dickhead, well Putin did a Trump and changed the laws so he can serve as America’s foe and Melania’s hoe until 2036. WTF? Look, Putin was supposed to be this super-duper “I Spy” intelligence guy. But he was taken for a ride during the Trump administration as I am convinced that Melania was acting as a “Double Agent” and our intelligence community had four years to feed crap to Putin’s mistress and the rest is Greek tragedy irony. Yes Putin saw a vulnerability as a direct hit to the White House and an Oval Office under Trump. But also remember “I Really Don’t Care Do U” was Melania’s motif operandi. And Putin knows it, that he was had bad by our CIA and if that information gets out to the citizens, well good luck at the voting booths. But it's rigged, so the only way Russians can take back their own “Mother Land” is for a coup. And when ARMY’s are mobilized, that is when the opportunity exists, for a New Russia in this February Revolution!

The old world must be destroyed,
Tear it down all the way to its root!
We do not need the golden idol,
We detest the royal palace!
We will help our suffering brothers,
We will feed the hungry!
We curse our enemies for their wicked deeds,
We will fight them together!

Refrain:
Arise, awake working people!
Charge the enemy hungry brother!
Cry out the vengeance of the people,
Forward! Forward! Forward! Forward! Forward!

The rich fists of the greedy pack
They steal your hard work.
Gluttons grow fat with yours,
They're tearing your last piece.
Starve so they feast
Starve so that in the stock market game
They sold conscience and honor,
So that they scoff at you.
(Refrain)
Rest for you is only a grave.
Prepare arrears all your life.
The vampire king pulls the veins out of you,
The vampire king drinks the people's blood.
He needs soldiers for the army -
Give him sons.
He needs feasts and chambers -
Give him your blood.
(Refrain)
Do you still want to be oppressed?
Arise, all brothers across the country at once!
From the Dnieper to the White Sea,
And the Volga, to the Caucasus!
The thieves, the dogs of the rich,
And the evil Tsar!
Bring them all down!
Light up the dawn of a better life!
(Refrain)
The rise of the red dawn,
The sun of truth and brotherly love!
Although we pay a terrible price,
With our blood for the happiness of the land!
And for our rightful freedoms,
The evil will vanish forever!
We will unite as one,
In the realm of sacred labor!
(Refrain)

Hail to our working brothers & sisters in Russia - We Are With You this February Revolution!

From America with Love, just ask Melania!

Love Potion #NANCY

 

Select Committee Vacancies

Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON “Chairman” and LIZ CHENEY “Vice Chair”, along with, ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, ADAM KINZINGER as “Rank & File Members” on the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the United States Capitol, along with the missing-in-action members in vacancy status;

There must be a hi-tech glitch with the “Select Committee’s” web-site “Home” page, as under the subject heading “hot-key” for “Funding Payments” the link is misguided, there are no entries and instead it goes to a dissipation on some dissertation about the subject matter of “part and parcel guilty”? “But you know, if you say you haven't done anything wrong, but on the other hand, you want to assert the Fifth Amendment in terms of self-prosecution, it says that you have something to hide. So we're going to give him an opportunity to do it. He can do it and it will be under oath and he is still subject to certain penalties should he decide to not tell us anything. If he is saying, 'I'll come but I'll plead the Fifth,' in some instances that says you are part and parcel guilty to what occurred - Moreover, Mr. Chairman, your recent comments in regard to witness that his assertion of 5th Amendment rights before the Select Committee is ‘tantamount to an admission of guilt’ calls into question for us what we had hoped would be the Select Committee’s commitment to fundamental fairness in dealing with witnesses - Finally, you reference news accounts regarding another witness’s ‘assertion of 5th Amendment rights before the Select Committee’ and claim that my comments suggest that a witness’s assertion of 5th Amendment rights is “tantamount to an admission of guilt.” That is not an accurate characterization of my position on the 5th Amendment.” When at the same time Dylan was playing in the background: “There must be some way out of here said the joker to the thief”. I mean, it makes sense this “partly cloudy and chance of meatballs”, like in that “part and parcel guilty” but still confused the joker to the thief? What if there was issued a search warrant for that “parcel”? Sounds like a drug raid and of course that could prove a recipient of illegal contraband in “parcel guilty”, so why the back-tracking Mr. Chairman? But whatever, it sounds serious as well as intimidating! Looking for $numbers$, not some 1st semester law school undertaking argument. You said it was “part and parcel guilty”, so in what “in some instances” were you talking about Mr. Chairman? Hope it was not in the context of “please check your biases, implicit and explicit wave of guilt”. Please fix so “We the People Proletariats” can see wherein our hard-earned income in taxation is going with this investigation into the “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol. OK, that “hot-key” to “Funding” still refuses to show up, so please for the sake of Transparency in Democracy update by posting “all” to-date “vouchers signed by the chair of the Select Committee” in accordance with H.Res.503 as in:

(f) Funding; Payments.—There shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives such sums as may be necessary for the expenses of the Select Committee. Such payments shall be made on vouchers signed by the chair of the Select Committee and approved in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration. Amounts made available under this subsection shall be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House Administration.

This is important to “We the People”, so please no hesitation in this request, as no doubt the evidence that this “Committee” retrieves courtesy the funding by the U.S. Taxpayers will be used against you in the court of law, with “respect to the institution” the Thompson v. Trump lawsuit seeking a jury award in unspecified $punitive$ and $compensatory damages$ for harm of “emotional distress” caused from the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol. Too bad “We the People” could not have joined in with that $money$ grabbing complaint, like the members of Congress were allowed to do so. What preferential treatment? It should have meant a class-action opportunity. And the way this “Committee’s” wherewithal is on the slide, like with Meadows and Eastman and Trump lawsuits now into mid-March more time extensions on the horizon, it is cause for even more “Emotional Distress” as did not the original schedule of events call for “Public Hearing” already started? Our tax dollars at work, while bridges in dire-straits of repair falling down. The best medicine for “Emotional Distress” is venting, sorry, but just like in that “part and parcel” outburst it works. One last thing, when you post the “vouchers”, maybe a little insight into how many “outside” lawyers this “Committee” retains and are now making a lucrative living on the Taxpayers’ dime this “investigation” and its numerous relative lawsuits. At last “part and parcel” count it was at least 8 just on the Eastman case alone! Look, not that we are against this “investigation” in its merit, would find not a more “Oh Happy Day” then to see Donald John Trump in an orange jump-suit and cuff-links missing the links, it just seems like the “Committee” in haste makes waste has engaged prematurely and it is back-firing in that “time is of the essence”.

And may we Patriotic Proletariats suggest that if Justice Nichols of the DC District Court finds in favor of Mark Meadows, in Meadows v. Pelosi and the Members of the Select Committee(1:21-cv-03217), that this “Committee” should be prepared to inform “We the People” why it failed to address such a concern early on, so that such a lawsuit could never be of consideration. It means the Chairman had close to 5-months to make sure this kind of legal challenge could not pose a threat that a Trump appointed judge could derail this “Committee’s” efforts, or at least slow it down considerably to the point it may be impossible to gain favor with “We the People” it is worth it still. That there could come a lower court decision based on the fact the “Committee” has not officially convened because it falls short of the language of House Resolution 503 - that which is specific in “The Speaker shall appoint 13 Members to the Select Committee, 5 of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the minority leader.” Shall, shall may be the Meadows’ winning ticket! As to date there are only 9 members. And there is no legal excuse that could amuse any reputable judge as “Any vacancy in the Select Committee shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.” Mr. Chairman, there’s Mr. Shall again! Vacancies are supposed to be filled accordingly and the original resolution was not amended to accommodate the existing “Committee’s” status of the “fewer”, as “No Markup Of Legislation Permitted.—The Select Committee may not hold a markup of legislation.” But by convening without a full posse, it rests its case as a “Mark Up” mark my word Mark Meadows is finding his way around this “part and parcel guilty” as it appears an abandonment of the principles of how “Committee’s” are supposed to perform. Even the RNC in its “legitimate political discourse” is calling out the Select Committee, that it is in violation “through disregard of minority rights”. OK, maybe they meant a different kind of minority rights! But just because the minority leader’s pick and choose of candidates, as was allowed in that “shall” obligation, so unbecoming that it found for a bad hair day for Nancy Pelosi, it is still not the way for the adults in the nursery in how they are supposed to act! Good faith? Pelosi made an agreement, it past the House with flying colors of blue then she reneged on it and here we find this “Committee” today, a sitting duck in a Mark Meadows’ lawsuit. And thus the subpoena served on Mr. Meadows and the referral of “Congressional Contempt” is then a moot point if Judge Nichols rules on the merits of a “Select Committee” in diapers. When to date that obligation has not yet been fulfilled, in honesty moving forward that Mr. Thompson make that mess-up known about now, as it would be a sad day for Democracy if this be the case and Mr. Meadows is successful in his litigation. And the real sad fact of the matter, if Meadows prevails “We the People” will end up paying his legal costs then some! Maybe the “Chairman” should start passing around the hat! By the way, is it that Mark Meadows’ lawsuit you think may be why the DOJ has not acted on this “Committee’s” referral holding this individual-of-interest in “criminal contempt”? Just asking for a friend. And another thing, please don’t waste the Taxpayers’ hard-earned income through unnecessary non-obligation kumbaya “hearings” just to make this “Committee” look good, as there exists no allowances for “Hearings” in H.Res.503. It merely allows an investigation and a report turned over to the House. Any “Public Hearings” would have to come after the report is issued, and with only 30-days before the “Committee” must dismantle when that report is delivered, it would be up to the House Speaker to schedule any “Public Hearings”, not this “Select Committee”.

G.I. Crow & Beat Crow - Lousy Hat Solidarity Party of Proletariats