The following criminal complaint was filed on April 12th by this "BLOG" against Hillary Rodham Clinton. Today, we learned that the "Inspector General" is requesting such an investigation.
~
Mr.
Steve Linick
Acting Inspector General
Office
of Inspector General
United
States Department of State
~
It
is through this correspondence, I respectfully submit and request
that the Office of Inspector
General as prescribed and
thus allowed under “Guidelines for Reporting Fraud” begin a
formal investigation upon Hillary Rodham Clinton.
~
Of
interest such an investigation
involves a
violation of 18 U.S.C.
CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART 1 – CRIMES, Chapter 101-
Records and Reports, §2071. Concealment, Removal or Mutilation
Generally.
~
Specifically,
a violation allegation under (b) "willfully
and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies,
or destroys (any record) shall be fined not more than $2,000 or
imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his
office and be disqualified
from holding any office under the United States." -
and as spelled-out in such guidelines consistent upon but not limited
to acts of misuse and or misconduct and or mismanagement, conflict of
interest, possible defense trade control violations and standards of
conduct violations unbecoming an official “office” holder under
oath.
~
Hillary
Rodham Clinton was acting in the capacity of the Secretary of State
for the United States of America, between January 21, 2009 through
February 1, 2013 and it was during that tenure that Title 18 may have
been victimized. Even though Hillary Rodham Clinton exercises her
rights today as a “Private Citizen”, since Hillary Rodham Clinton
may still be in possession of “U.S. Government Property”, the
OIG's oversight and over-reach should allow such an investigation to
evaluate
that when acting as Secretary of State and under oath whether
or not Hillary Rodham Clinton
did indeed violate
that “oath” with respect to “custodial” duties.
~
Only
a thorough investigation can find closure with the latter
questionable acts and send a message of deterrence to future
government officials
under oath, especially with high ranking officials acquiring
responsibilities with respect to custodial duties of department
records. Without
a proper “Investigation”, the “American Citizens” are
victimized, thus placed in harms way making an investigation not just
a suggestion, but out of
necessity.
~
As
Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton was a “custodian” as
outlined and still in effect today - SEC.
4. And be it further enacted, That the Secretary for the Department
of Foreign Affairs, to be appointed in consequence of this act, shall
forthwith after his appointment, be entitled to have the custody and
charge of all records, books and papers in the office of Secretary
for the Department of Foreign Affairs, heretofore established by the
United States In Congress assembled – as APPROVED, July 27, 1789”.
~
Since
Hillary Rodham Clinton may be
showing interest as a future
“Office Holder” under
the United States, it is paramount that the “American Citizens”
have an opportunity to make sure there have been no such
violations committed that would
forfeit holding such “Office”, if such a violation against the
custodial records “duty”
occurred. It is best to set the
record straight now, as any future investigations that indicate a
violation could mean “Impeachment Proceedings”, consistent with
the “forfeit” clause of Title 18. We must act now, as the latter
is not a posture this nation should be bothered with as it weakens
our global standing.
~
A
possible “custodial
records” violation appears
the case with respect to the e-mail correspondences exported or
imported by Hillary Rodham Clinton on a non-governmental non-approved
net-work while acting
in the capacity of “Secretary
of State” and while under
“oath”. It is with this request that the “evidence” that
could either “Prove” or “Disprove” any wrongdoing be
immediately confiscated, that being the controversial “Server”
wherein Hillary Rodham Clinton has
admitted publicly an instrument utilized for “Official”
concealment.
~
As
the “Custodian”,
Hillary Rodham Clinton may have held a
privilege upon the use of a
“private network” for official business, yet the “custodial”
requirements are still in effect. This correspondence requesting that
the OIG begin a formal investigation into such allegations
confronting dereliction of
responsibilities is in no way
shape or form frivolous, not intended to dishonor Hillary Rodham
Clinton, but an attempt to make sure the system of merit has not been
derelict or violated, and if so, should deny any further privilege
to holding an “office” under the “United States”,
as is so defined under
the existing public law.
~
This
is a serious matter, and I believe it is your responsibility as
Inspector General to make sure an investigation is without haste
begun, or through this correspondence it is realized that the
evidence supports some semblance of an investigation consistent
with Title 18 and if not solely
through the OIG's
jurisdiction that you take this
opportunity to involve other “criminal” investigative oversight,
such as the FBI and/or Department of Justice.
~
Since
Hilialry
Rodham Clinton did recite the “Oath of Office”, we must get to
the bottom of any possible
wrong doing with
respect to the questionable
responsibilities when
acting as an “official” of
the Department of State.
~
It
is also noted for reference: “That
the books, records, and other papers of the United States, that
relate to this department, be committed to his custody, to which, and
all other papers of his office, any member of Congress shall have
access: Provided, That no copy shall be taken of matters of a secret
nature, without the special leave of Congress.”
I believe
the
wording of “Secret Nature” is paramount to kick-off such an
investigation, along with the
fact Hillary Rodman Clinton has refused to allow the “private
server” to be accessed “by any member of Congress”. If
the Founding Fathers realized
merit in
establishing “law” that finds “well
and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about
to enter.“ violated
while under oath, that was
considered serious enough that
it would eliminate violators
from holding any present or
future office, we owe
it to the Founders to make sure we uphold that
establishment.
~
If
Hillary Rodham Clinton violated Title 18, she is not allowed to hold
another “office”, and only an investigation can determine that
priviledge
or deny that priviledge. Without
a formal investigation, we dismiss
this nation's integrity.
Respectfully
Submitted on April 12th,
2015, by S. Pam McGee