Alaska Chinook: Getting It “RIGHT & LEFT”

Have it your way? Where's the beef? See, the “Right” that continues to attack Hillary Rodham Clinton is steadfast its approach to fail Bill's princess based on the promise they want her incarcerated – throw the book and away the keys! And when I hear some speak of “Espionage”, what the Laa De Freakin' Da is wrong with your mind? Maybe left in that “van down by the river”. That's way out in “Left” field craziness, to think of 007 stuff. Mrs. Hillary will never see the likes of an “Orange” jump suit, as she doesn't deserve such a sentence for letting a “Server” code-named “Monica” go haywire! Yes, the neo-conservative concentration camp is basing its opinion on a violation of 18 U.S. Code §1924, which finds jail time for mishandling of “Classified Documents”, and the next step for a violation under the “Espionage Act”. Sad, such a monstrous attack on an individual due her association with the 42^nd. So the Hillary team has been very adamant that NO “Classified Documents” are at issue, even though the admittance of guilt to the possible removal, retention, concealment and mutilation by cleansing the surface of the disk drive memory of pertinent “government” documents so exists. BUT FOR, we must not hesitate to look at a milder code “obstruction of justice” violation by Hillary while acting in the capacity of “Secretary of State”. Based on the fact her own “public admittance of guilt”, namely in violation of 18 U.S. Code §2071 – which finds a measly $2000 fine. Yes, chump change for Hillary and Bill, with an advertised combined net worth of $100-million. So both codes find a “shall” fine or jail time or both, depending on the severity of the violation. Said again, there is not yet demonstrated any ill-intent by Hillary, just a “Sillary” moment the use of a “private parts server” and in the end the attempt to, well mutilate evidence is what finds a pre-meditated “minor crime” offense. So cast away any interest in a jail sentence, a $fine$ is fine in my judgment, even if it does not cover the so-far wasted time by Congress to find a breach under cover of “Classified”. Obama said so, eluded upon that it was “a mistake, did not endanger national security“. So do the crime, do the time and in this case a $fine$ “SHALL” suffice. But there is a caveat, the ultimate difference between “U.S. Code 18 U.S. Code §1924 & §2071”, besides §1924 dealing with “Classified Documents” and §2071 dealing with “Any” document, even maps of the local strip joints. Read my lips: 18 U.S. Code §2071 - be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

18 U.S. Code §1924 – Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material:

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).

(c) In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

18 U.S. Code §2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally:

a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

What am I getting at? For a measly $2000 fine Hillary would be set free from any further Rowdy Gowdy interrogation. “We the People” would not be subject to funding some more the “Benghazi Select Committee”, a.k.a. “waste” with respect to the e-mails and off subject the committee's “mission”. And those of us that believe Hillary and Bill should retire into the sunset, well what are we waiting for? So please dismiss any desire to send Hillary to jail, but when an individual is derelict the duty, then the sentence of “disqualification” has far reaching consequences and this is indeed what America needs today, as this is what the “Founding Fathers” set forth into motion, some 227-years ago and is indeed a bipartisan compromise – NO jail time, NO office time. Have it “OUR” way, YES... and NO more beef!