HE Said, SHE Said...OK,
it is easy to see that the fascination
the news' media finds with Hillary Clinton
and for a time on hold, that it
is loud and clear once again.
“But for” a
short-lived victory for those that have nothing better to do then
mesmerize our minds with segregated “opinions” in efforts to
persuade
us to be like them and vote like
them. Dylan
warned us about such with
“everybody wants you to
be just like them” with
“Maggies's Farm” - today a reality! But,
the news' media of our
times
is not like of old when
the “Cronkites” roamed
and romanced our
living rooms at dinner-time,
today it doesn't command anymore
notoriety or respect for
endorsing a candidate – as “We the People”
can do our own homework – the
bed we make! See, supposedly
more tuned into the 1st
2016 Democratic
Presidential debates then ever of record, as
many had heard about
Hillary's SNL audition. For
myself, I channel surfed between the L.A.
Dodgers “Let's
break a few legs” playoff game
and tried to get a take on Bernie Sanders during the “stretch”.
Read my lips, as Bernie's message was also loud and clear, “Tired
of the DAMN e-mails”!
Well, the truth in reasoning this statement
finds the fact that many of us are indeed
“Tired”, “DAMN Tired of
Hillary”. Look, those many-more
tuning out baseball and tuning in the debates did so NOT for
Hillary's sake, but to get a glimpse of who and what this Sanders'
character
is all about. Said again, “We
the People are TIRED”! Now following the “Candidates Debate”,
DNC Chairperson Debbie Was-a-Maniac Colonel-Klink-Schultz
and the DNC “Water Boy” -
Howard Dean – they sounded off that the “Debate” was a win for
the “Democrats”? It's a
debate, win or loose! Get the
point, nothing in return in
between, because it
was not a slam-dunk victory for Hogan's
Heroes Hillary -
something that was needed in
efforts to find a game changing directional boost for her tanking
credibility. Yes, it is almost
on the exponential path of
no-return – slippery slope in
layman's terms. So, this means
SHE didn't pull it off the way many had hoped –
especially MSNBC's Cyst Mathews. SHE
didn't loose, but did not gain the traction her compassionate posse
of bimbos had intended to take
her freely to the interrogation...I
meant inauguration. With this
supposed
win for the Democrats, with
those that had already made up
thy mind to insult this nation by a “Hillary for President”, well
it means Joe Biden blew his chance. But it is good news for Mr.
Sanders, as it is an indication some are still searching. The latest
“Zuckerberg Poll” - which is a predictive model that can scan
the future based on other polling numbers – the forecast shows that
by this time next week Hillary's restorability
numbers remain stable at 24%
“Weiner
Take All” with
Sanders gaining
3% as Biden fans peel
away towards...well away from Clinton. OK, so I am in agreement that
the “e-mail” episode has played out its course and of course is a
“Witch Hunt” still in effect
due the fact even though we hear once again threats of a
“government shutdown”, that
the “energizer” is alive and
well and roaming the “Halls of
Congress”.
So here
is what should be taken as closure the Hillary “e-mail” scandal
and put to rest forever the
“Server” now under the “Witness Protection Program”. Come
the Benghazi Committee hearing next week in which Hillary will unveil
more excuses,
it should be a simple case closed hearing wherein Chairman Trey Gowdy
gavels in a sentencing. No more
questioning, just end it forever speak our
peace with no “crime” committed with the Benghazi cover-up issue
and also address
the “e-mail” predicament for
closure – two birds with one stone. First
and foremost, Hillary was Secretary of State and through “Oath
of Office”
was the caretaker and “custody
of records”, so the use of a
“Private Server” serves as the evidence of a dereliction of duty.
With that said,
she violated that oath by her
own actions by loosing “custody” and
has so admitted “it was wrong”, the same sentiment that we hear
from the Commander-in-Chief. So two wrongs make for, well pay the
fine for the minor
offense – just so we can
recoup some of our looses. See,
according to “Rules” promulgated by the “Founding Fathers”,
Hillary Clinton should be held
in contempt of the Constitution. Then Gowdy
should slam
the gavel
and everybody can go home, end of story. NEWSFLASH:
Hillary
pays $2000 fine for violating 18
U.S.C. § 2071 then
is told with such a
charge of record, well “...disqualified
from holding any office under the United States.”
Now the media has a “STORY”!
GOTCHA? No,
what the law states and in this case should be appreciated
and condoned as it will send the
message that those in high office must be accountable.
ZUCKERFACTS:
APPROVED, July 27,
1789, the FIRST CONGRESS:
SECTION
1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, That there shall be
an Executive department, to be denominated the Department of Foreign
Affairs(Today known as the Department of State).
SECTION.
3. And be it further enacted, That the said principal officer, and
every other person to be appointed or employed in the said
department, shall, before he enters on the execution of his office or
employment, take an oath or affirmation, well and faithfully to
execute the trust committed to him.
SEC.
4. And be it further enacted, That the Secretary for the
Department of Foreign Affairs, to be appointed in consequence of this
act, shall forthwith after his appointment, be entitled to have the
custody and charge of all records, books and papers in the
office of Secretary for the Department of Foreign
Affairs, heretofore established by the United States In Congress
assembled.
On
January 21, 2009 Hillary Rodham Clinton was sworn in as Secretary of
the Department of State(Originally the Department of Foreign
Affairs): “I, Hillary Rodham Clinton, do solemnly swear that
I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States
against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true
faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely,
without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will
well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am
about to enter. So help me God.”
With
that, Hillary Clinton became the responsible “custodian” of all
records, books and papers(which includes e-mails) of the entire
Department of State – this is a sworn responsibility we find in the
U.S. Constitution – under merit of “well and faithfully to
execute the trust committed”! In March of this year, we learned
that Hillary Rodham Clinton - while in the capacity of Secretary of
State - may have destroyed e-mails that could have been subjected to
such “custodial” requirements.
Now
according to 18 U.S.C.: § 2071 - Any custodian of a
public record who "willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes,
mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys (any record) shall be
fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than three years,
or both; and shall forfeit his office and be
disqualified from holding any office under the United States."
Fact
1: Hillary Rodham Clinton was the defacto “Custodian” of
State Department “Records”, through the “Oath of Office”.
Fact
2: Hillary Rodham Clinton has already admitted to destroying
“Records”.
Fact
3: By refusing to turn over the “SERVER” in question wherein
Hillary Rodham Clinton deposited e-mails of State Department interest
during her tenure as “Secretary of State”, that finds merit under
“Unlawful Concealment”.
Fact
4: “That the books, records, and other papers of the United
States, that relate to this department, be committed to his custody,
to which, and all other papers of his office, any member of Congress
shall have access: Provided, That no copy shall be taken of matters
of a secret nature, without the special leave of Congress” - in
which a “leave” under such “custodial” responsibility had not
been granted by Congress. Hillary Rodham Clinton has also denied
Congressional access to the e-mails in question.
Guilty
of violating the law? YES, so what does it mean – read the fine
print: “BE DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING ANY OFFICE UNDER THE
UNITED STATES”!
If
“We the People” refuse to hold Hillary Rodham Clinton responsible
for violating the law, it means the “Constitution” is under
attack!
PS.
I am not a republican, just a “True American” that wants justice
served for what appears to be a simple “crime” committed against
the U.S. Constitution.
ZUCKERBERG
Sidebar: In 2009 President Barack Obama signed into effect
a crucial “Executive Order” that mandated proper training for
those responsible for “Classified Documents”, including the
“Caretakers” as was Hillary by virtue her position as Secretary
of State. Considered a requirement in that “EO 13526” was
enforcement that “All Caretakers of Record” be initially trained
then required refresher training courses each following year –
mandatory training and this included Hillary Clinton. If an
individual were to miss the initial training and or there-after
refreshers, the privilege of access to “Classified Information”
could be denied, until such time training was authenticated. In
April, this year, I made a simple request to the State Department for
Hillary Clinton's “Traing Records” with respect to “EO 13154”,
this was through a “Freedom of Information Act” request. Yes, a
no-brainer simple request for a few training documents. Well, I just
received back a repulsion response following another response that it
will take until January of 2016 to find the records? Why such a delay
and a violation of the FOIA “Transparency” requirements, because
Hillary didn't receive any training, as maybe she was just to “DAMN
TIRED” of abiding by the rules...
Obama's
Exectuive Order(that which should be in effect and sink Clinton):
d)
All original classification authorities must receive training in
proper classification (including the avoidance of
over-classification) and declassification as provided in this order
and its implementing directives at least once a calendar year. Such
training must include instruction on the proper safeguarding of
classified information and on the sanctions in section 5.5 of this
order that may be brought against an individual who fails to classify
information properly or protect classified information from
unauthorized disclosure. Original classification authorities who do
not receive such mandatory training at least once within a calendar
year shall have their classification authority suspended by the
agency head or the senior agency official designated under section
5.4(d) of this order until such training has taken place. A waiver
may be granted by the agency head, the deputy agency head, or the
senior agency official if an individual is unable to receive such
training due to unavoidable circumstances. Whenever a waiver is
granted, the individual shall receive such training as soon as
practicable.
Sec.
5.5. Sanctions. (a) If the Director of the
Information Security Oversight Office finds that a violation of this
order or its implementing directives has occurred, the Director shall
make a report to the head of the agency or to the senior agency
official so that corrective steps, if appropriate, may be taken.
(b)
Officers and employees of the United States Government, and its
contractors, licensees, certificate holders, and grantees shall be
subject to appropriate sanctions if they knowingly, willfully, or
negligently:
(1) disclose to unauthorized persons
information properly classified under this order or predecessor
orders;
(2) classify or continue the classification of
information in violation of this order or any implementing
directive;
(3) create or continue a special access
program contrary to the requirements of this order; or
(4)
contravene any other provision of this order or its implementing
directives.
(c) Sanctions may include reprimand,
suspension without pay, removal, termination of classification
authority, loss or denial of access to classified information, or
other sanctions in accordance with applicable law and agency
regulation.
(d) The agency head, senior agency
official, or other supervisory official shall, at a minimum, promptly
remove the classification authority of any individual who
demonstrates reckless disregard or a pattern of error in applying the
classification standards of this order.
(e) The agency
head or senior agency official shall:
(1) take
appropriate and prompt corrective action when a violation or
infraction under paragraph (b) of this section occurs;
END
of STORY! SHE is TOAST...and can stay out of jail for a measly $2000 bucks, but well worth the payoff for "US".
