12/4/21, 4:48 PM Tip Line | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol
TIP LINE
Chairman Thompson is interested in any information regarding the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission.
First Name: Stugots
Last Name: Scoregge nella mia testa
Email: LousyHatSolidarityParty@USA.com
Phone Number 202-456-1111
Details:
Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON
as “Chairman” along with, ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM
SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, LIZ
CHENEY, ADAM KINZINGER as “Honorable Members” on the “Select
Committee Investigating the January 6th “Attack” on the United
States Capitol”;
Grave Concern, that by
releasing the Jeffrey Clark transcripts and other pertinent information
regarding that “witness” when at the same time this “Committee” keeps secret
the same information of sorts the so-called 250 “unknown” witnesses that “volunteered”
to come before this “Committee”, by signaling out Mr. Clark it rises to a sense
of harassment and at end may entertain self-inflicted sabotage of this “Committee’s”
efforts. The fact of that matter in McGrain v. Daugherty in “Justice” by the U.S.
Supreme Court in “opinion” that “Experience has taught that information which is volunteered is
not always accurate or complete; so some means of compulsion are essential to
obtain what is needed.” And with that, one would think that because
of that “accuracy declaration or lack of”, that this “Committee” would be more
productive by releasing that information by the “volunteers”. “We the People”
are not interested in following this “Committee” in its so far failed attempts
to subpoena a “person of interest”, as with those 250 volunteers, what guarantee
does the “Committee” have with respect to “accuracy” as pointed out by
Associate Justice Van Devanter in McGrain? Yes, stories could change! And what
does the release of the Clark ”transcripts” try to prove? That McGrain landmark
decision is cited herein based on the fact that the “Select Committee” has also
cited it in its very own of-record investigation into that January 6th
matter.
And be it known, that on November
29th, the Department of Justice filed a motion against Steve Bannon, to limit
this same kind of participation in harassment of justice - aka “witness
tampering”. As a “TIP”, please police your actions, else this entire investigation
will find no message worth its merits and the perpetrators of that January 6th
“Attack” on the U.S. Capitol will never own up to any reason in accepting
responsibility, just like the end result of Impeachment #1 and Impeachment #2,
Thank You Adam Schiff and Jamie Raskin! Asking for a friend, who is instructing
or prescribing this kind of “witness tampering”, as if it is outside counsel
retained for the purposes of this “sabotage”, maybe this “Committee” has been
Trojan Horsed!
Respectfully
Submitted as a “Matter of Grave Concern” by the “Lousy Hat Solidarity Party” under
the Freedom of Obligation and under the guidance of Marshall v. Gordon and
not intended to “prevent or obstruct the discharge of this Committee’s legislative
duty.” In no way shape or form should this “Correspondence of Concern” impede
the House’s ability to legislate.
No comments:
Post a Comment