MEADOWS v. PELOSI
(1:21-cv-03217)
There appears to be a “Hail
Mary” interference pattern…why in hell is a Federal Court Judge trying to assist
in the assassination of the U.S. Government? Yes, a continuation of the January
6th “coup” is what it is in my book! I am talking unchallenged interference by
a sitting judge – yes a Trump nominee – that has issued a prejudicial INVITE to
the DOJ as an intervener in the Mark Meadows’ civil case, in an attempt that
which in action is Government v. Government. Double-jeopardy? And did not the SCOTUS already rule
against the entire Trump Dysentery Dynasty of fools, that the concept of any “Executive
Privilege Immunity” was null and void? That’s right, Baby Brett Kavanaugh
insisted that the “High Court” did NOT bind that decision in Trump v. Democracy,
that even though Joe said so to this “NO” that the Clarence Clowns thought that
Trump should enjoy that luxury to be left alone, even if it meant a “coup”. Don’t
trust this judge, as he may be looking for a “legal treatise” to formulate a favorable
verdict for Trump’s minions, like Meadows and Bannon that are now in “hot water”
for their contributions in Trump’s “coup d’scare”. As the question of valid subpoenas
issued by the Select Committee to compel these Trump minions remains a dynamic variable
of interest, wherein such an unprecedented and unwarranted “INVITE” could sink
Bennie Thompson’s ship of Schiffs! An “INVITE”, only as a ways and means to circumcise
jurisprudence, here it is as motioned on June 23rd:
MINUTE
ORDER. Upon consideration of the record of this case, the Court notes that
Plaintiff's(Mark Meadows) arguments rely, in part, on certain opinions of the
Office of Legal Counsel, The Court therefore INVITES the United States
Department of Justice to submit a statement of interest, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 517, addressing its view as to whether Plaintiff is entitled to absolute or
qualified testimonial immunity from the subpoena at issue in this case. It is
ORDERED that any such statement, if submitted, should be filed no later than
July 15, 2022. If such a statement of interest is filed, the parties may file
responses on or before July 29, 2022. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on June
23, 2022.
Which means an attempt to
utilize “stare decisis” as a “Get Out of Jail Free” card for Meadows and at the
same time Steve Bannon is crying out loud to the same Judge that he cannot have
a fair trial, that “voir dire” excuse. Stay tuned as a single jester that is
in-line with the Scumbag Court of the Unfit States could “resurrect” the Trump
Insurrection.
One last thought this
concern: Did not the DOJ already say it was not interested in that “Congressional
Contempt” referral for Mark Meadows? Yes, but Meadows continues to proceed
along with his civil case, which is all about that Bennie Thompson “subpoena”.
Which no doubt was the catalyst for the contempt referral, as Meadows pleaded
that he had “immunity” and with the DOJ finding in his favor, because Merrick Garland
did not want to get involved with anything that Nancy LousyLollaPelosi’s “Office
of legal Counsel” has already messed up, well it is not over with until the fat
lady sings. See, when the DOJ said it was not interested in Meadows, it was due
the confusion factor that Pelosi’s legal staff has introduced into the legal
equation and the DOJ was hoping that with its finding, to not hold Meadows in “Contempt”
facing a fine with jail time, that Meadows would then ask for his legal fees in
this civil case be paid for and he would then just go away, that it would be a Simple
Simon case in “closure”. That has back-fired and this Trump judge is calling the government's bluff!
No comments:
Post a Comment