On January 19th, this
year, the Supreme Court ruled against former president Donald John Trump, in
his efforts to claim forever-stamp like “Executive Privilege”. In challenge that
“privilege” he did not have to respond nor provide “documents” to the Select
Committee investigating the January 6th “Domestic Terrorist Attack”
on the U.S. Capitol. A ruling from the “High Court”, it was no doubt about it a
loss for Trump and in most legal cases it would mean “Case Closed” the Grand Wizard
has spoken! But what has transpired since that “opinion” against Trump’s wishes
by the Justice Robert’s Court, well just what in blazing saddles hell is going
on? See, in this case in merit upon delivery by the SCOTUS a victory for the
United States, the Defendant’s - Bennie Thompson & the Select Committee” - it
had to finalize an answer to the Trump complaint, usually a very Simple Simon
answer in brief that any 1st year law student could handle, just
point to what the SCOTUS ruled. But for some “Crazy Psycho Shit” reason, Donald
Trump on one side and the government lawyers on the other side, both sides were
in “mutual agreement” to allow a 2-week extension for that answer to be gaveled
in - so it could then mean CASE CLOSED! That was paramount, as until the
complaint was set fee, it allowed Trump wiggle room away from any chastising by
the “Select Committee”, like in maybe a subpoena? Let’s face the facts, the “Committee”
has issued how many subpoenas yet has yet to schedule the Kingpin to the gavel gallows?
Now the reason for this request in extension, so Donald Trump “can
determine his next steps”. OK, the ruling against Trump from the SCOTUS
was rather odd, as Brett Kavanaugh is of record that the denial by the “Court”
any “Executive Privilege” exists, that the ruling from the “High Court” was neither
“binding” or “set-precedence” moving forward, and somewhat in “opinion” in
favor that a President should enjoy some semblance of an “Executive Privilege”
- talk about a Mobius Strip mentality! Then again, maybe like a shot across the
bow for the “lower courts”, should this same subject once again try to wreck-havoc
with the jurisprudence of justice served. So I ask may it please the court, what
“next steps” is Trump talking about? He lost, what is it his attorney fails to
understand? For that matter the government legal counsel also blind-sighted, to
go along with this prolonging bull-shit to agree on the “mutual agreement” to
extend the pain and agony of a Moron at the helm for 4-years why more? OK no
big deal, what’s a few extra days deliberating his loss. Then, after the 2-week
extension had almost come to a close out, low and behold came another “mutual
agreement” extension between the parties, this time a request for another
30-days behind schedule in allowing this “Case Closed”. And Sad Sack enough,
the same damn reason was given by our government lawyers, so “Donald
Trump can determine his next steps”. I ask again for Miss liberty,
“What next steps” the damn SCOTUS already rendered a decision that said nothing
about “next steps” we are getting into some preferential treatment herein! But
wait there is more entertainment your Tax Dollars at work enriching the legal
community! That answer by Bennie Thompson’s government lawyers was supposed to
be signed, sealed and delivered by yesterday, March 7th, but it was a NO SHOW! Shame on you? No, because
low and behold instead of an answer, yet another “mutual agreement” extension
between the parties - Donald Trump and Bennie Thompson - and if you can get 2-weeks
then 30-days may as well go for the gusto and request 60-days more! So now it
is out to May 6th, and during the time there is NO ANSWER and the
CASE CLOSED sign has yet to be illuminated, and Donald Trump cannot be subpoenaed,
cannot be subject to arrest…is there something wrong with our system in
jurisprudence? So here it is below how our Courts, which we thought we could
Trust, well were we fooled!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DONALD J. TRUMP, Plaintiff, v. BENNIE G. THOMPSON, et al., Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-2769 (TSC)
JOINT MOTION FOR A FURTHER
TWO-WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND THE COMPLAINT
The parties to this matter
jointly request a two-week extension of time for Defendants to
respond to the current Complaint. In the absence of an extension, Defendants’
response is due Friday, January 21, 2022. The Court has granted one prior
extension of the response time. The parties’ motion is supported by good cause.
In the evening of January 19, 2022, the Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s
Application for a Stay of Mandate and Injunction Pending Review. See Order No.
21A272, 595 U.S. ___ (2022) (Jan. 19, 2022). The parties have since conferred
with respect to Defendants’ forthcoming response to the Complaint and the
future of the litigation. Given the recent decision from the Supreme Court and
the Archivist’s subsequent production to the Select Committee of the records at
issue in this litigation, the parties agreed that the best course was to defer
the Defendants’ response so that Plaintiff can determine his next steps.
Accordingly, the parties request that the Court grant this unopposed motion for
a two week extension of time, until February 4, 2022, in which to respond to
the Complaint.
Dated: Jan. 21, 2021 - This being the 1st 2-week extension.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
DONALD J. TRUMP, Plaintiff, v. BENNIE G. THOMPSON, et al., Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-2769 (TSC)
JOINT MOTION FOR A FURTHER THIRTY
DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND THE COMPLAINT
The parties to this matter
jointly request a further thirty day extension of time for
Defendants to respond to the current Complaint. In the absence of an extension,
Defendants’ response is due Friday, February 4, 2022. The Court has granted two
prior extensions of the response time. The parties’ motion is supported by good
cause. The Supreme Court recently denied Plaintiff’s Application for a Stay of
Mandate and Injunction Pending Review. See Order No. 21A272, 595 U.S. ___
(2022) (Jan. 19, 2022). The parties have again conferred with respect to
Defendants’ forthcoming response to the Complaint and the future of the
litigation. Given the decision from the Supreme Court and the Archivist’s
subsequent production to the Select Committee of the records at issue in this
litigation, the parties agreed that the best course was to further defer the
Defendants’ response for thirty days so that Plaintiff can determine his
next steps. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court grant this
unopposed motion for a further thirty day extension of time, until March 7,
2022, in which to respond to the Complaint.
Dated: Feb. 4, 2022 - This being the 2nd extension, for 30-days.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
DONALD J. TRUMP, Plaintiff, v. BENNIE G. THOMPSON, et al., Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-2769 (TSC)
JOINT MOTION FOR A FURTHER
SIXTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND THE COMPLAINT
The parties to this matter
jointly request a further sixty-day extension of time for
Defendants to respond to the current Complaint. In the absence of an extension,
Defendants’ response is due March 7, 2022. The Court has granted three prior
extensions of the response time. The parties’ motion is supported by good
cause. The Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s Application for a Stay of Mandate
and Injunction Pending Review, see Order No. 21A272, 595 U.S. ___ (2022) (Jan.
19, 2022), and on February 22, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s petition for
certiorari. See
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022222zor_bq7d.pdf. The parties
have again conferred with respect to Defendants’ forthcoming response to the
Complaint and the future of the litigation. The parties agreed that the best
course was to maintain the status quo and further defer the Defendants’
response for sixty days so that Plaintiff can determine his next steps.
Accordingly, the parties request that the Court grant this unopposed motion for
a further sixty-day extension of time, until May 6, 2022, in which to respond
to the Complaint
Dated: March 7, 2022 - This being the 3rd extension, this time for an
additional 60-days.
Simple Simon you do the
math, and I guess Baby Brett Kavanaugh was right, that a former U.S. President
can exercise an “Executive Privilege” when it means just not days but months in delays and thus staying
away from the “wrecking ball” of justice deserved! Trump wins again.
No comments:
Post a Comment