Jan. 6th Whoopee Cushion

Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON “Chairman” and LIZ CHENEY “Vice Chair”, along with, ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, ADAM KINZINGER as “Rank & File Members” on the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th “DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACK” on the United States Capitol;

Congratulations on confiscating as evidence and making that DOD “draft” to steal the voting machines a feeding frenzy for the news media. It reads like the “Real McCoy” as a “fictional thriller” and like Zoe has stated, an “unsigned lawless document”! In the evidence worth category, a minus 45, no author no signatory. So what’s the fuss, tell me what’s a happening. See, had this “draft” been accompanied by that “Operations Order” often acknowledged by OPORD and possibly a WARNORD, as an indication to the DOD that an actual OPORD was imminent so be prepared, well this “fictional thriller feeding frenzy” is a joke, as without the “guts”, that OPORD which is a detailed how to what to when to where to why - it doesn’t exist and more then likely the insane idiot that fabricated this “draft” had no idea what is behind such an “Operations Order”. And without it, the Brass would have done nothing, even if that “draft” was signed by the Donald Jong Trump, as it is the cart before the horse thinking it is worth anything of significance in evidence. And like some of the street talk, whomever came up with this “mutiny” idea “could not have been of sound mind”. And do you really think the former Moron-in-Chief understood what an “Operations Order” was all about - only if it was for takeout, cheeseburger-cheeseburger-chips, no coke Pepsi. So talk about a mountain out of a mole hill. The military geniuses that wrote that thing up, when are they going to be “Court Martialed”? So way to go on getting boots on the ground your investigation. Hey, what a thought! Any idea when the “Select Committee” will be part of the SNL lineup? Since the members seem to over enjoy boob-tube time, may as well have some fun while you are at it. Evidence must be hard to come by. But I think the Oval Office also had a stack of Mad magazines, maybe you should subpoena that stuff also, as that would be just as important as that DOD draft. And I don’t believe Alfred E. Neuman would refuse a “friendly invite” to speak to the “Committee”, as if anybody knows how Donald John Trump’s brain works, look no further then Alfred. Just a TIP, as laughter is still the best medicine and this “Committee” keeps on giving us something to bust our guts, so keep up the good work.

Phonies J. Whoopee Cushion - PB&J Institute of Higher Learning 

10%s Club - A Privilege

Amazing, 10% of the Democratic delegation representing Californians in the House of Representatives of the 117^th Dolittle U.S. Congress suffers from “Emotional Distress”, an injury sustained through the January 6^th “Domestic Terrorist Attack” on the U.S. Capitol. And in that capacity of acting “in their personal capacity”, well sue-sue-sue which they have and in that “Prayer for Relief”, asking for a jury to award an unspecified amount in “$punitive damages$”, to be determined under the court rules for “compensatory awards”. In this case the bailiff is Donald John Trump. Now we all have a life, so that is why this lawsuit, that which was started by Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, it states the benefactors of any jury award are acting in that “personal capacity” which may be true - if so how come they are all using their U.S. Capitol “Representative” office address for the filing and answering of this “civil” complaint matter what does it matter - scene of the crime I guess. See, that places their primary place-of-work in the “Danger Zone”, as a claim for “ED” can only survive those involved in a close-proximity relationship to the “crime” scene. Which means those of us that suffered the same degree of “pain & suffering” from remote while watching Trump’s “Militia” attack the “House” of “We the People”, fat chance of any relief. Now more power to them members of Congress in a position to receive $millions$ in extra-benefit relief funds, as that type of “Prayer for Relief” requested to be determined by a  jury-of-peers, especially in the District of Columbia, a jury award for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress can find $millions$ in that verdict. Like in “So help me God, one more Prudhoe Bay”, an age old saying after the money dried up in Alaska, after the pipeline construction ended so did big fat paychecks. Now I have no disrespect those that are suffering from “Emotional Distress” some in severity to use the courts for redress the harm sustained, but would not it be a nice gesture if in that court filing that these members of Congress - that already get paid a handsome wage and a handsome retirement - to arrange for any $punitive damage$ award in the form of money be placed in a piggy bank for all of us to enjoy - a rainy day fund? Is not that the True Meaning of “Representation”. Or take that extra $cash$ to feed the homeless one last “Real Deal” meal? I mean think of it, suing Donald Trump and his Dysentery Dynasty and using the proceeds to feed hungry mouths. But here is my take on what is really going on here. If this lawsuit finds no merit, is dismissed due a frivolous undertaking by individuals that knew of this harm but placed themselves in harm’s way regardless of the all-around sound warning signs, as it was premeditated and planned well in advance but the Congressional leaders did nothing to abate the possibility Trump could and would pull it off, yet the “Emotional Distress” lingers on, what says then that in that “personal capacity” that Uncle Sam will be asked to pay-up for that “Harm”? A Cha-ching sing along thing. But can California survive with 10% of its representation under the influence of “Emotional Distress” some categorized as “severe”?

Shot across the…bow-wow

OK, the Brett Kavanaugh “Open Door” Policy is now the “law of this land” sea to shining sea, ahchoo! Wow, win one for the Stiffer! And even after the Supreme Court Jesters ruled against Donald Jong Trump in the majority “poo-poo” no such “Executive Privilege” can be exerted to confiscate pictures of nudies found in the Oval Office shithouse under Trump’s watch…whatever. For real, nude pictures of his daughter? OK, let me get serious for once and be one ahead of Donald Jong in that category of honesty as the only seriousness the Moron ever found in life was a divide by 3 margin of error. Look he over-inflated his townhouse by a factor of 3 for value so Ivanka could buy more jewelry, but at the same time under-valued the same damn shithouse by that same factor for “Taxation” purposes, and ended up with a rebate courtesy of Uncle Sam. So, what factor does he use to evaluate his pennis? +3 or -3? Just asking for a friend named Ghislaine. Scratching, what is with the “ghis”? I am supposed to be serious, so the “Supremes” ruled in favor of “Transparency” a blow for Trump. But even so, one would think that with all the Congressional “subpoenas” issued by the Beenie Bop Thompson “Select Committee”, well this ruling would no longer allow many already served to compel a continuing out in excuse, now throwing out the claim of Trump’s “Executive Privilege” he told us to fib. Today, it is no longer a claim to use that Trump pardon me “fuck you and that subpoena”! But here it is in reality, as one would think that the No Shows would be lined up at the Capitol bright and early the morning after the verdict awaiting to be “tied to the whipping post”, for thinking they could get away with this “we live above the law”. But there exists the same number of No Shows today, no one that executed that Trump cover thought that Supreme Jester verdict was gospel, still nowhere to be found. Still in defiance, those that disregarded a valid subpoena, based on what they thought was “Inherent Executive Privilege” in confidentiality and in the merits of the legal system still in defiance, why so? What happened to the concept of “law abiding”? Because Brett Kavanaugh issued an “opine” that chastised the lower court’s decision, like a shot across the bow, and wowed us that he did not concur with how the lower courts ruled against Trump, that the decision in appeal was too damn broad and was not necessary in the context of jurisprudence, so Brett placed the lower courts on notice - that Big Daddy was watching. And in the same “opine”, we learn that Jester Clarence Thomas likes “chastity belts”. And with that, Brett so informed Trump’s evil doers, those that have so far defied that motion to compel through a valid subpoena under oath, that the High Court’s ruling did not set precedence, which means…flubber dubber! Here it is, what Baby Brett cried out about when his nanny Robert’s told him to write the “opine” before a diaper change:

Statement of JUSTICE KAVANAUGH respecting denial of “Privilege”.

The Court of Appeals suggested that a former President may not successfully invoke the Presidential communica­tions privilege for communications that occurred during his Presidency, at least if the current President does not sup­port the privilege claim. As this Court’s order today makes clear, those portions of the Court of Appeals’ opinion were DICTA and should not be considered binding precedent going forward.

Moreover, I respectfully disagree with the Court of Ap­peals on that point. A former President must be able to successfully invoke the Presidential communications privi­lege for communications that occurred during his Presi­dency, even if the current President does not support the privilege claim. Concluding otherwise would eviscerate the executive privilege for Presidential communications.

By protecting the confidentiality of those internal communications, the Presidential communications privi­lege facilitates candid advice and deliberations, and it leads to more informed and better Presidential decision making. If Presidents and their advisers thought that the privilege’s protections would terminate at the end of the Presidency and that their privileged communications could be disclosed when the President left office (or were subject to the absolute control of a subsequent President who could be a political opponent of a former President)[see accompanying Note of Disqualification this Dissent], the conse­quences for the Presidency would be severe. Without suffi­cient assurances of continuing confidentiality, Presidents and their advisers would be chilled from engaging in the full and frank deliberations upon which effective discharge of the President’s duties depends.

To be clear, to say that a former President can invoke the privilege for Presidential communications that occurred during his Presidency does not mean that the privilege is absolute or cannot be overcome.

The Court of Appeals concluded that the privilege claim at issue here would not succeed even under the Nixon and Senate Select Committee tests. Therefore, as this Court’s order today makes clear, the Court of Appeals’ broader statements questioning whether a former President may successfully invoke the Presidential communications privi­lege if the current President does not support the claim were DICTA and should not be considered binding precedent going forward.

Twice, Baby Brett shit is his already soiled diaper, with the ruling by the lower courts in appeal against Trump, that which set into motion involvement and interference by the Big Daddy Court - that it did not set precedence nor was it binding, which means the next merry-go-round could find the Big Daddy doing an about face. Especially if another similar case makes its way to the Interference Court. And now that the lower courts are on notice this cajoling “loop-hole”, well all those defecating dissidents of a Congressional “subpoena” that should have pissed in their pants with this High Court ruling against Trump’s pennis erection privilege, they are laughing just as before, because this is who we are today as a nation - a bunch of babies in soiled diapers because…there’s jerking off going on in the shithouse!

Sister O' Sister

Back in 1972 John Lennon and Yoko Ono repurposed the “N” word in “Woman is the Nigger of the World” and that was a deserving citation, as women were still being treated like slaves. But today, there is a single stunt that is trying to undo what John was successful at achieving, trying to re-repurpose again that “N” word back to its origins and she has a Gini pig "slave" that is acting as an accomplice for this rewind. Like in History repeats itself.

Bennie Thompson's MUTINY

Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON “Chairman” of the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th “DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACK” on the United States Capitol;

Please stay off the boob-tube, in all due respect just shut-up, or else have someone that has an IQ greater then “Life Below Zero” test ride any questions you will be asked by the Madcow network or any affiliates of the news media that are trying to cash in on the “Select Committee’s” ineptness. Look, anybody in your position that believes the “military was part of this big lie” machine when there is not a single iota of any such evidence, no truth whatsoever good luck finding any to support your frivolous accusations, just what are you trying to prove? It is surely very UNPATRIOTIC to say the least, especially disheartening as you are a “sworn to duty” member of the U.S. Congress. I think it says in that oath something about “will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office.” And with your CBS temper-tantrum relying on a “draft” proposal that was not signed by anybody in authority, it was not a battle-plan approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, it was some reckless crackhead plan, a ridiculous fantasy sent to the Oval Office by a minion of the Moron. It could have come from the ADX Florence warehouse, would a postmark have helped you realize that Ted Kaczynski like lunatics are locked up but still possess a 1^st Amendment Right? Look, during the Vietnam War rage, the “military” did get involved wherein it should not have, but for real, you think we are seeing the same play out here - it would be a Colonel Kurtz “Mutiny”. And you did not STOP, when on-the-air during that CBS throat-cutting segment, in the sense that the “Military” was engaged in “promoting that the election was false. So, if you are using the military, to potentially seize these voting machines, even though it's a discussion, the public needs to know, we've never had that before.” There was no “potential” ever, I doubt if even there was a “discussion” as it is insane thinking, and just as insane to even think it finds any revival as “evidence” before your “Committee” - it would never happen in this Country. If this is what the “Committee” sees as viable information for evidence gathering, and it will then in distemper rage waste the “Taxpayers” time and dime to track down a fictitious “draft” letter that has “reject” as a signature and “retarded” as a plan of attack, I guess it will make your final story Blazing Saddles “Comic Relief” ready!

And since this “Committee” commenced, NOT once has any member had the decency to talk out loud about Ted Lieu’s “Congressional Inherent Contempt Resolution”, that which is still pigsty stuck in the Pelosi cesspool. As if you did speak out about it to get it moving in interest, in complaint that this is a “resolution” that would be very beneficial to what this “Committee” is stool-stuck upon day-after-day with respect to a valid “Congressional Subpoena” laughed at by those served, well as taxpayers we would be calling our representatives to get this thing passed pronto, as it allows the Congress to “fine” - which means less theft from the U.S. Treasury as “We the People” would like to see the tab for this “Committee’s” so far shenanigans paid for by the pirates. I may change my mind when the “Final Report” is executed this “shenanigans” in reason, but we already know what happened in the sense there is already enough public information to issue a report, as we don’t need a bedtime story, especially one that throws the “Military Machine” in disgrace! There is but for a single disgrace, the fact that Donald Jong Trump has not been made to answer for his responsibility for the planning and execution of that January 6^th “Attack”, as he was the “DOMESTIC TERRORIST” Commander. Just ask him “under oath”, as he is still proud that it happened and continues to gain attention, from useless investigations that continue to waste time and money. And from what we have already in the “public domain”, it is enough to indict that ham sandwich and every damn crumb!

In all due respect some more, Mr. Thompson you are of record in claim you suffer from “emotional distress” from that January 6^th insurrectionist riot, it appears lingering anguish may be affecting that sworn duty, as this kind of thinking should be kept hidden away until such time you have the evidence “so help me God the Truth and nothing but the Truth”, as without it places our men and women in uniform in a bad light, it is Un-Patriotic to throw our troops under the bus the way you have demonstrated recently, in yet another round of unrehearsed diarrhea of the mouth what has become a common malignity with this Committee’s membership, that claim to fame “they’re gonna make a big stud out of me”. Even if it were true and it was a plan approved by the “Joint Chiefs”, do you really believe the troops would carry it out? To reiterate, do “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” a favor, SHUT UP until such time your investigation has all the pieces of the puzzle, and then it would be time for your stooge stagecoach to make a show of appreciation. Until then, please refrain from these outbursts, as what you share on the MSNBC and CNN and other’s dime, well how come the “Select Committee’s” web-site does not inform us of what is going on, as “We the People” deserve that respect. So if you cannot find the decency to keep an up-to-date log on that web-site, then like I have already demanded, please SHUT-UP as I am sick and tired of having to tune in to the boob night-after-night hoping for some “for real” sound news and all I get is more “Confusion Say” from the Zoes and Schiff-for-brains and the Raskins and the Arugulas, all part of the Beenie Bunch, with entirely different opinions! At least get the stories straight before “Showtime”! And to tell the news media that William Barr has been talking with the “Committee”, was that through a subpoena or a “friendly fire invite” - as the Transparency this “Committee” indulges in is by far the worst I have ever seen for a sub-branch of Congress, and that can only spell “doom” if it continues. And it also tells me that Nancy Pelosi is out-of-touch with what this “Committee” is after, as I am sure that if she were involved, she would have the same damn concerns found herein, as we get to understand individuals after so many years in the limelight of public service. Maybe I to can make a quick $buck$ writing a Woodward like read, call it the “Beenie Mutiny”, all in quotes to fake out reality! My TIP, No More boob-tube-time interviews by any members of this “Select Committee”, refrain away from such two-bit tid-bitting, concentrate on the “mission” instead, that being the individual responsible for your “Emotional Distress”.

Mr. H. Elp NIED, Lousy Hat Solidarity Party

No Exercise of “Confidentiality” is requested with this “TIP” Respectfully Submitted by the “Lousy Hat Solidarity Party” under the Freedom of Obligation and under the guidance of Marshall v. Gordon and not intended to “prevent or obstruct the discharge of this Committee’s legislative duty.” In no way shape or form should this “Correspondence of Concern” impede the House’s ability to legislate, it is just entered as a “TIP”. 

Select Committee 1/23/2022

Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON “Chairman” and LIZ CHENEY “Vice Chair”, along with, ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, ADAM KINZINGER as “Rank & File Members” on the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th “DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACK” on the United States Capitol;

What is going on? Appears to be more “Mutiny”! Now I would doubt that Adam Schiff could explain this one, as he balked in trying to figure out how to answer Lawrence the puzzle master, when he was asked if the so-far meritless “subpoenas” served by the “Select Committee” held conditional recall obligations upon those that were compelled to testify and did not join the ranks of the No Shows. OK, he said he did not know of any such inherent obligations and has not yet corrected the record. I wonder what Tribe would say about that? OK, benefit of doubt it’s the weekend give Adam some time to read the “rules”. So, why in Hell’s Gate Kitchen did this “Select Committee” bend over to Donald John, the main sponsor and initiator of that January 6^th “DOMESTICE TERROSIST ATTACK” on the U.S. Capitol? Yes bending over backwards just this past Friday at 6:27pm ET, like it was the weekend so we can get away with it - so this is still a hot topic adventure time to buckle up! In the final inning that is, with Trump v. Thompson, to give his legal team 2-additional weeks, so the involved parties can finalize the complaint against Bennie Thompson, the case the Supreme Court of the United States just granted this “Committee” a victory. This is pure stupidity, as for real a motion “supported by good cause” and both parties to the action in agreement? So was Trump’s “Domestic Terrorist Attack” through “good cause” also! And this joint accommodation for a 2-week extension, wherein “the parties agreed that the best course was to defer the Defendants’ response so the Plaintiff can determine his next steps? This gives frivolous a whole new chapter in the “Law Journals”. I am lost for words, as this “Select Committee” should not have Mr. Nice Tie...this request wastes precious time and resources. Do you think Trump would reciprocate the same kind of request? This “Committee” should have stood its ground and denied Trump an extension, should have delivered a close-out answer by COB on January 21st as was originally the “Court’s” requirement and in that response the “Committee” should have demanded “reasonable costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees as permitted by law”, just like in the “Complaint” read for Trump under “Claim for Relief” - had he prevailed. Then it would have meant case closed “Friday” and Trump would be on the hook for wasting the U.S. Taxpayers $loot$, instead we read about this outlandish dealing allowing Trump to plan his next move. What if his next move is calling out his “Militia” again - this sucks the sail out of “DEMOCRACY”. And what is with this “so he can determine his next steps”? It reads like a lobotomy campaign. This is sad, and I can only guess at two considerations why this extension was granted, as it was not necessary under any obligation and or merits - he lost fair and square now must just go away! So either this “Committee” is not serious any final legal standing that could or would indict Donald John Trump as the “Master-Mind” behind the planning and execution of that January 6^th “Domestic TERRORIST ATTACK” on “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” or else the outside legal teams employed and enjoyed by this “Committee” are playing the same game just like Trump, stall and stall as that makes money as someone has to stay abreast of what the other crook is doing. In that extension request, it should have been a direct “NO”, instead of hours of conferring, which adds up in legal considerations. And if this SCOTUS deed is still “Pending Review”, well Brett Kavanaugh thinks that Joe Biden may have been politically motivated to disallow the former President any room for “confidentiality”, even more reason this “Committee” should have opted out any “extension”, as do you really think we can trust Donald Jong Trump’s “next steps”? Do “We the People” a favor, hire some legal experts that work not for the $buck$, but are in it as a Patriot for Patriotism, no different then this “Committee” wanting individuals-of-interest to come forward and shed a tear as their Patriotic duty to Country.

Fin Gernail Freddy, Sprocket for the Lousy Hat Solidarity/Proletariat Party

No Exercise of “Confidentiality” is requested with this “TIP” Respectfully Submitted by the “Lousy Hat Solidarity Party” under the Freedom of Obligation and under the guidance of Marshall v. Gordon and not intended to “prevent or obstruct the discharge of this Committee’s legislative duty.” In no way shape or form should this “Correspondence of Concern” impede the House’s ability to legislate, it is just entered as a “TIP”.

~~~~~

Case 1:21-cv-02769-TSC Document 51 Filed 01/21/22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DONALD J. TRUMP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )      Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-2769 (TSC) )

v.

BENNIE G. THOMPSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

JOINT MOTION FOR A FURTHER TWO-WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND THE COMPLAINT

The parties to this matter jointly request a two-week extension of time for Defendants to respond to the current Complaint. In the absence of an extension, Defendants’ response is due Friday, January 21, 2022. The Court has granted one prior extension of the response time. The parties’ motion is supported by good cause. In the evening of January 19, 2022, the Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s Application for a Stay of Mandate and Injunction Pending Review. See Order No. 21A272, 595 U.S. ___ (2022) (Jan. 19, 2022). The parties have since conferred with respect to Defendants’ forthcoming response to the Complaint and the future of the litigation. Given the recent decision from the Supreme Court and the Archivist’s subsequent production to the Select Committee of the records at issue in this litigation, the parties agreed that the best course was to defer the Defendants’ response so that Plaintiff can determine his next steps. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court grant this unopposed motion for a two week extension of time, until February 4, 2022, in which to respond to the Complaint. Case 1:21-cv-02769-TSC Document 51 Filed 01/21/22.

Brett’s DICTAHEAD DISSENT

 

Donald Trump v. Executive Privilege

Statement of JUSTICE KAVANAUGH respecting denial of “Privilege”.

The Court of Appeals suggested that a former President may not successfully invoke the Presidential communica­tions privilege for communications that occurred during his Presidency, at least if the current President does not sup­port the privilege claim. As this Court’s order today makes clear, those portions of the Court of Appeals’ opinion were DICTA and should not be considered binding precedent going forward.

Moreover, I respectfully disagree with the Court of Ap­peals on that point. A former President must be able to successfully invoke the Presidential communications privi­lege for communications that occurred during his Presi­dency, even if the current President does not support the privilege claim. Concluding otherwise would eviscerate the executive privilege for Presidential communications.

By protecting the confidentiality of those internal communications, the Presidential communications privi­lege facilitates candid advice and deliberations, and it leads to more informed and better Presidential decision making. If Presidents and their advisers thought that the privilege’s protections would terminate at the end of the Presidency and that their privileged communications could be disclosed when the President left office (or were subject to the absolute control of a subsequent President who could be a political opponent of a former President)[see accompanying Note of Disqualification this Dissent], the conse­quences for the Presidency would be severe. Without suffi­cient assurances of continuing confidentiality, Presidents and their advisers would be chilled from engaging in the full and frank deliberations upon which effective discharge of the President’s duties depends.

To be clear, to say that a former President can invoke the privilege for Presidential communications that occurred during his Presidency does not mean that the privilege is absolute or cannot be overcome.

The Court of Appeals concluded that the privilege claim at issue here would not succeed even under the Nixon and Senate Select Committee tests. Therefore, as this Court’s order today makes clear, the Court of Appeals’ broader statements questioning whether a former President may successfully invoke the Presidential communications privi­lege if the current President does not support the claim were DICTA and should not be considered binding precedent going forward.

Note of Disqualification: When “We the People” have a Supreme Court that violates the separation required between Constitutionality and the bipartisan political state, we have no such supreme jurisprudence and DEMOCRACY is doomed. Only a Jack Marler REVOLUTION will save “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” from such “Treason”, as it appears that Jester Baby Brett Kavanaugh was in support of allowing Donald John Trump unfretted “privilege”, a DICTAHEADSHIP. As well what was found in the dissent of Jester Clarence Thomas, as slated; “JUSTICE THOMAS would grant the application.” and in combination such dissents finds but for a single attribute, giving them aid and comfort…and the Founding Fathers held a definition of what that meant!

~~~~~

DICTA - A comment, suggestion, or observation made by a judge in an opinion that is not necessary to resolve the case, and as such, it is not legally binding on other courts but may still be cited as persuasive authority in future litigation. Also referred to as dictum, dicta, and judicial dicta.