Alaska - once the “Last
Frontier” state - has found its fair share of reality TV melodramas
over the years – from sea sick wannabe slime-liners to road rage
worriers to gold-diggers bent on daily fist fighting rather then
sifting for gold. And those series on the “Bush” cops in Alaska,
don't you just love how it portrays the Alaskan Native population as
a bunch of drunks! I am glad that the gold-digger gang was kicked out
of Alaska, as every time a show aired there came evidence of
environmental abuse and an observant citizen would file a complaint
with the local authority. If I were one of those natives filmed
walking cock-eyed through the village, I would find a good lawyer and
sue the bastards out of the state – forever! Why is it that we have
“oversight”, or supposed to have oversight on site, but it takes
the observant “couch potato” citizenry to call the bluff? What do
you mean oversight in Alaska is dead per an executive order by
Governor Parnell? So kudos to the citizens who take it upon
themselves to make a difference when a law has been compromised, I
guess it is not wasted time after-all in front of the boob tube in
that respect. Just like how Ted Nugent went caught, for wounding a
black bear while on an Alaskan Safari. Yes, Ted's film crew caught
him breaking the hunting rules and when it was aired, somebody called
“America's Most Wanted” and Ted was arrested and when confronted
shit his pants – again. Yes, Ted found a way to avoid the draft,
just shit in your pants during that psychological evaluation at the
recruiting post – “Reject, next”! Maybe that is how Dick Cheney
found 8-deturdments during his time before the recruiters, as we all
realize how well he “crapped” all over America while acting out
his fantasies as president. But has the viewing pubic been taken for
a ride with Alaskan based reality TV shows, including those with
Sarah taking the stage? Take the filming about that road going from
the Yukon River north to the “slope”. I have driven that road
many times, in every season and under conditions questionable. My job
on the pipeline required that drive, and if not by road when duty
called, there was always a helicopter available or a well equipped
snow-cat. Due inclement weather, I have camped out in concrete
dungeons that hold the batteries for the Remote Gate Valves –
critical devices along the Trans-Alaska-Pipeline where there exists
no roads, just remnants of a once upon a time construction road, now
somewhat faded away. Yet in all “reality”, it is not that bad of
a road. Or was OK until the ban was lifted, one that now allows
cruise ship motor coaches to make it unsafe. Just like will happen
with the salmon - unsafe - now that the same industry holding hostage
this state's delegation can discharge “crap” while calling on an
Alaskan port. Shit Ahoy! Honestly, DON”T EAT THE SALMON! But that
road north as a matter of fact not fiction, it is maintained above
and beyond most “public” corridors as it is the life-line of the
oil fields up in Prudhoe Bay. Hey, the workers up north are not
“unionized” so cannot “strike”, but cut off the prime rib or
lobster, forget about any work from that 5000 headcount! So in the
6-years I drove up and down that road, never once did I have a bad or
borderline experience that would warrant defining that road as
exceptable for a reality series – unless the entire filming is
purposely faked along the way to make it look dangerous. In fact,
except for some of the mountain passes, when it is -50 the roads have
excellent traction as the cold and dryness provides exceptional
gripping action - remember that area of Alaska is considered a
“desert”. And I have been on “real” ice-roads, built with ice
on top of ice on the Beaufort Sea during the winter and extending
12-miles out into polar bear country, wherein driving 70-mph was not
a problem, once again the cold ice and dry climate acting like
suction cups with the rubber treads! And talk about a mountain pass
road with a dangerous disposition, just drive down Thompson Pass into
Valdez during the winter after a good snow blow! So is this road from
the river to Deadhorse like is so portrayed on that “Ice Road
Truckers” reality series? NO, not even close. And the reason I
question this one particular “reality” show, there exists many
more much challenging roads in the lower-48 – defined as the
extreme – wherein it is “Dangerous”. Take Donner Pass for
instance. I just drove through that area ahead of an approaching
storm, it was still a knuckle bitting experience. I counted at least
a dozen jack-knifed semis, all equipped with chains as this area
finds a type of snow that is very difficult to maneuver such a heavy
payload even when prepared. And talk about a roller-coaster ride! I
would like to see the “Ice Road Trucker” gang trying this one out
on a bad day. On a scale of 1 to 10, the Dalton Highway under
similar conditions would maybe rank a 5, giving Donner Pass a 10 in
the difficulty category. So what gives, why such fanfare on mediocre
dangerous roads, or hitting the fishing grounds aboard monster sized
fishing boats in luxury when the little guy boats are the ones that
have a tough time out at sea? Why not have a film crew on Donner
Pass, or along U.S. Interstate 80 when snow and wind hits hard? Well
it is the “friendliness to filming”, as Alaska allows for some
generous tax haven credits to those that venture north with camera
and crew. And since “Reality” shows have not famed actors but
local folks, it is a cheap way to make a living. It works like this.
I hire a crew to film some wannabe hunters on a caribou hunt and
during Act 1 the hunters end up killing over a 100 animals, just to
get it right. In the end, it costs my company $10-million to produce
the documentary, as with the illegal hunting, I can promote also my
“Reality” cop show and also film life in a village of inebriates
- thus killing three birds with one stone. Due Alaska's tax haven for
my “Floozy Films, Inc”, I get a credit of $4-million against my
corporate taxable income. The only problem, I don't live in Alaska
and my business is incorporated in Delaware, due no liability. That
is how I get away with killing all those caribou! But I can sell the
“tax credits”, to an Alaskan corporation, for pennies on the
dollar. Yes, I can sell $4-million in “Corporate Tax Credits” to
entities like British Petroleum, or the Koch Brothers – which
already receives a $2.5-million break from the Alaska Railroad,
courtesy the U.S. Taxpayers paying for a “Commuter Rail”, which
is a no show just like the M.V. Susitna. And that “Tax Credit” is
fully transferable to an Alaska entity that must pay corporate taxes
to the State of Alaska. Think about it. You have a business in
Alaska, your taxable income after depreciation and loopholes is
$4-million – as you must have employed an honest and ethical
accountant. So you pay “History of Porn Filmmakers” $2-million in
return for $4-million in credits, which means you are off the hook
for employing an honest tax accountant. Better luck next year, to
that accountant now unemployed! Anyway, you get a decent break for
not even knowing what end of the camera is up or down and Alaska gets
screwed. Now once upon a time we thought Alaska had something
worthwhile for its new “Hollywood” image, but when “Sarah and
the Wasillabullies” left town, so did Alaska's true worth as the
“Last Frontier”. Things are getting back to normal, as Sarah's
ratings tank and the “Wasillabully” mentality retreats, but will
this state ever recover to what it was before John McCain went mad? I
doubt it. Look, any outfit that applies for a “film tax credit”,
it should have a referee and at least some semblance of a policing
policy to gage whether or not a film has merit and does not ridicule
Alaska, its people, especially the Alaskan Native culture. Sure that
culture struggles with addiction problems, but let's not make fun
over it! And all that in-fighting, with the truckers and the
gold-diggers, that ain't happening in the oil patch, but you don't
see the film crews making fun of that industry do you? The earlier
“reality” shows tried to portray Alaska different then what it is
really all about, in efforts to find that “couch potato”
non-thinking audience. I would like to see the IQ of those that waste
time watching this “crap”! Now if the filming has merit, is
beneficial to Alaska and doesn't make it look like we are a bunch of
losers, drunks, cigarette smoking bandits raping the oceans, then
maybe a film credit is OK. Today it stinks, and this state is as
close a replacement for Hollywood as Sarah is as a replacement for
the “Naughty Granny” - Playboy's comic relief. Look, there exists
outfits from the lower-48 that buy some name-worthy outdoor clothing,
spend $40,000 on a trip to Alaska, take a few shots of a babe in the
attire, and get the credit! Basically, if you want to take a luxury
trip north to Alaska, plan it out wherein you take some pictures of a
fishing pole then sell these to an advertising agency, then you get
the benefit of a freebie trip to Alaska – courtesy the celluloid
tax benefits. So like everything else that started out with good
intentions, it is taken advantage of and today we see not good stuff
with Alaska's good name attached, but “crap” broadcasts and I am
sure Ted used the tax credit, and was caught red-handed! But when a
state has so much oil wealth totaling a reserve of $45-billion, this
“tax credit” means peanuts in the big picture show, so what is
the sentiment. Then why in hell is Alaska still the biggest welfare
state of the Union? Maybe it is time we give some of that welfare
back, to the U.S. Taxpayers that have been raped and pillaged by
Alaska's delegation retrieving way too much loot that would have
served a better purpose somewheres else - but wait there's more. See,
had the goons that managed the “Reserve” here in Alaska been NOT
asleep at the wheel when the market crashed, after Dick Cheney took
the “Big Shit” on his way out of the “Oval Office”, this
state would have a reserve well over that $45-billion, as we lost
that much to the Wall Street hedge-fund thieves, so after 6-years we
are back to where we started, and that my friend makes room for more
abuse! See, “Hollywood” is still laughing, and the laugh is on
us!
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment