Constitutional Fortitude Forfeiture

With all the upheaval about this and about that what is supposed to define with refine the Founding Fathers’ madness behind the U.S. Constitution, why is it we still have not a clue? Why is it we still scratch the nogg’n trying to think out loud what it all means. And how come this “WTF” moment upon the “Supreme Law” of the land enabled by the “Committee of Eleven” in mystery, why so it comes out of the woodwork when we have not the time to waste repurposing our knowledge base, like during an election? And for real, to think a compromised U.S. Supreme Court should have a final say? Nay Nay said the Town Crier.  Remember the “hanging chad”, that was how many years ago and we still have no idea how an American presidential election turned erection like today is supposed to work. And because we as a nation find such weakness in an election in chaos…OK, for years what was behind this “road map” to Democracy securing “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” in liberty this “Republic”, no doubt it was based on an honor system, actions deployed by both sides of the isle what was best for all walks of life “We the People” are created equal - don’t laugh, at least we were getting there at a snail’s pace things take time. Then came the Trump Dysentery Dynasty to divide and conquer, and talk about disrupting “Tranquility”. But maybe this was good in respect to a way overdue response to figure out what it all means in time, as it was not draining the swamp but “aiding and abetting” the enemy - the latter defined as that fact we have not an understanding of the U.S. Constitution and that will destroy US! And maybe for once we may have to dedicate a Patriotic wherewithal to decipher what is inherent in between the lines of that “political bible”, that heritage handed down through the generations. So I have one question on that Constitution, something that has been a bone(r) of contention my understanding since I was of age to walk and chew gum at the same time, I meant of age to drive and vote and an obligation to study and understand “civics” in efforts to graduate from high-school.

Accordingly:

Section 2. [HOUSE]

No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five Years.

Section 3. [SENATE]

No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the age of thirty Years.

So my question, why in hell the “age difference”?

Because our Senators were supposed to be “more mature” and the reason I am laughing and crying at the same time!