Garland - Trump’s Whippin’ Post

Wow, I was just driving by 950 Pennsylvania Avenue and blurring from behind closed doors “Sometimes I feel, sometimes I feel, like I've been tied to the whippin' post, tied to the whippin' post, tied to the whippin' post.” And it was a holiday! Maybe the cleaning staff, no rest for the wicked. OK, that is the headquarters for the U.S. Department of Justice not to be mistaken for Sarah Palin’s imaginary White House, that is at the 1400 address that today looks like a camp for the homeless? Hey there’s John Boehner and Paul Ryan, begging for food? But that crying out loud voice in pain seemed to be that of the Chief Attorney, as it appears that Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice is merely acting as a “Whippin’ Post” for Donald John Trump, so may as well think of it as the Department of Injustice - for the time being. Hey, all good things come to that end, just ask John and Paul!

With the DOJ, it boils down to this. When a “Contempt of Congress Citation” was signed, sealed and delivered by House Squeaker Nanny LousyLollaPelosi to Garland’s DOJ, that which found Steve Bannon in contempt of a “Congressional Subpoena” issued by the “Committee” investigating the January 6^th Insuregnecy”R”Us, it gave Trump a “pillow guy cushion” of legal relief. When that “citation” arrived, Garland should have dismissed it immediately, as the DOJ was not in the position to “trump” the U.S. Supreme Court in precedence-set case law and thus remanded that desire to indict Steve Bannon backwards wherein it came from - the House of Congress. Now of course the legal team for Trump and Bannon as well as with the rest of the “thugs-in-tights”, any 1^st semester student of law could have easily motioned for a “quash” any DOJ involvement, based on the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court has already generously ruled on how Congress should react if a subpoena for documents and/or witness testimony goes ignored, but none did. Because the advantage with the DOJ interference was now in favor “for” Trump, not against him and his cohorts in crime, with Garland accepting this “citation”. See, had the DOJ performed its duty with due diligence, that remand to deny any DOJ involvement would have cited McGrain v. Daugherty. As a valid excuse to recuse the DOJ from getting involved in this battle going on, with Trump’s minions ignoring a “Congressional Subpoena”. The roadmap exists, so the DOJ had no other legal option then to refuse this “citation” to indict Steve Bannon, but Garland balked. Just wait, as in a matter of time the matter of Doe Trump v. Doe Pelosi, in time with all the court motions and plaintiff commotions this mess will make its way to the Supreme Court, which will no doubt refuse to issue an opinion based on the fact the “High Court” is already of record in support of McGrain v. Daugherty. And just today, with Trump trying to argue his discretion of “executive privilege”, his legal team asked the D.C. Court of Appeals for a stay in that matter anticipating a visit to the “High Court”. But with Trump’s case in combat with LousyLollaPelosi’s “Select Committee”, the reason the DOJ should but for “but out” is the fact that the cases are identical, with the only difference any contention in similarities finds that in that 1927 landmark decision, it was the Senate involved in a dispute over investigative subpoenas and not the House. But that decision by the “Four Horsemen”, staunch Republicans that ruled the “High Court” in the late 1920s, it acknowledged that it did not matter, as both the Senate and the House could act independently with investigations of national interest wherein “subpoena power” was essential. And the “High Court” insisted that Congress could “attach” - aka “House Arrest” - an individual that ignored a “Congressional Subpoena”. With confidence set with precedence set, that law of the land still finds an automatic “indictment” upon any individual that ignores a valid “Congressional Subpoena”, no judge no court no nothing just a Braveheart Congress that is not afraid to tell the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest the ignorant un-patriotic Bannon bastards. Now all those 2^nd year law students of Lawrence Tribe will now argue that the “Congress” cannot “prosecute”, so what’s my point? That there exists no provisions in the U.S. Constitution that would allow either the Senate or House to act as a “prosecutor”. True, but there is no need for a prosecutor in this case as there is no sense of a crime committed bearing a demand for punishment prescribed by the courts in an arraignment, it is merely the fact that “Congress” has the power of “attachment” without a fair trial, without a challenge of a “habeas corpus” violation, as this “attachment” has limits. As what is all so interesting with this decision from the U.S. Supreme Court, it allows the “Congress” to keep those “attached” behind bars until such time those still under a “subpoena” start to cooperate and answer any and all investigative questions to the satisfaction of the “Committee”. On this stage, the High Court ruled that “habeas corpus” is over-ruled, until such time the imprisoned individual is willing to talk or provide the required documents requested through the “subpoena”. And while under this “behind bars” punishment for ignoring a “subpoena” to provide testimony, there is no such thing as “Executive Privilege” being exercised, no interference by such a ludicrous undertaking like how this notion in locomotion has found its way into the merits of justice with Trump’s gang, that it exists for an ousted president and merely an obstacle designed at stalling the worthiness of jurisprudence. What it means in exercise the McGrain verdict, either answer the questions or stay behind bars. Give in and go free, thus limits established for this kind of incarceration without “prosecution”. Now one in the “hot seat” can request any answer to survive “confidentiality” treatment, but still must answer and then the “Committee” can weigh the advantage or disadvantage to granting that “confidentiality”. In a nutshell, if an answer helps the merits of what the “Committee” is searching for, there is no “confidentiality” case closed. So if Mark Meadows was under “House Arrest” as he well should be by this time, a question like “Did Donald John Trump direct you to plan and activate this January 6^th attack on the U.S. Capitol”? Well Meadows would have to answer, and if Meadows acknowledged that it was Trump’s intent, to plan this attack but in answer Meadows asked for “confidentiality”, there would be no such protection as this answer would be enough to charge Donald John Trump with “Treason”. The weighing factor would be in favor of “no confidentiality” thank you Mr. Meadows you are free to go home time for the Sergeant-at-Arms to “House Arrest” Donald Trump - it’s about time!

So what does it all mean, with all of the legal experience in the “Select Committee” that promulgated this use of the DOJ instead of relying on the established McGrain verdict, that which is supported by the U.S. Supreme Court? Well it appears just a bunch of free-loaders that somehow made it though law school and walked away with that degree, but left all common sense at the graduation wishing well, same with Merrick Garland for thinking he was a Supreme Court Justice and revisiting the McGrain outcome.

In the meantime, Trump’s legal team is buying time on the U.S. Taxpayers’ dime. And when finally the Supreme Court gets to take up any requests that have anything to do with the LousyLollaPelosi “Select Committee” in investigations with subpoenas and thus refuses any involvement due McGrain, that Congress took a detour so must face the consequences and those “subpoenas” are worthless, well by that time it will be too damn late in the 117^th 2^nd session to start all over again. What also matters, in McGrain in “opine” by Associate Justice Willis Van Devanter, the issue of timeliness is respected. Wherein the High Court discourages the normal legal channels for holding an individual accountable for ignoring a “Congressional Subpoena”, through the “Courts” due the time constraints associated with “delays” and instead found that the “attachment” better suits the needs of Congress; “To await the slow process of indictment and prosecution for a misdemeanor, might prove quite ineffectual, and necessary legislation might be obstructed, and perhaps defeated, if the legislative body had no other and more summary means of enforcing its right to obtain the required information.”

So just another reason that Garland should have taken the side of this decision by the Supreme Court, and sent the LousyLollaPelosi Adam Schiff-for-brains tantrum back to the “Select Committee”. As now Trump has time on his side, the “Select Committee” has sabotaged any relief by involving the DOJ and when the 118^th comes to life some 2-years after that Insurgency”R”Us attack, there will be no interest to reconvene a “Select Committee” that was in reality just a “Reject Committee”. And this is how the 117^th Congress under LousyLollaPelosi and Schmoozer Schumer, with the Democrats in the “majority” both chambers, how they themselves destroy the Founding Fathers’ DEMOCRACY. History in the making!

LousyLollaPelosi "KY" Jelly

 Follow the $Money$?

How about instead follow the Desolation Road trail! Better instead, how about following the Nancy LousyLollaPelsoi Destructive Diarrhea trail, just follow the from-under stench, don’t need a GPS! Yes, as the Congressional latrine runneth over and the political waste is free-flowing its way to the cesspool of the Proletariats, “some people never worked a day in their life, don't know what work even means, well meet me at the bottom don't lag behind, bring me my boots and shoes” that’s us! As no matter what they tell us in the spirit of dereliction the duty to uphold our Founding Fathers’ DEMOCRACY, shat still rolls downhill! Look any Simple Simon Say’s “Fork’n Moron” can see that with this LousyLollaPelosi and her Democratic planned “Congressional Select Committee” investigating the January 6^th GOP planned Insurgency”R”Us attack on the United States Capitol, it is so far by far well, “the blind commissioner is in a trance”! And with the Adam Schiff-for-brains and company, “so immaculately spiteful, one hand is tied the other in his pants” which means the “Committee” went off sniffing drain-pipes and reciting the pigsty-Latin alphabet. OK, let me Simple Simon renew the vows of the Constitution. And just yesterday, Adam decided to rename that waste of time as the “Cheerful Readiness Committee”? See, “Committee” member in “alacrity” Jamie Raskin was a co-sponsor of a House Resolution that would allow “Congress” to slap a sizeable $100000 fine on any citizen that refuses a “Congressional Subpoena”. Which means by now, with all the “subpoenaed “No-Shows”, about 100% of this “Committees” $monetary$ waste to date would have been supplemented not by the U.S. Taxpayers but from $fines$, from way back in September when LousyLolla went lighting farts for fun. OK, a brain fart with this “Select” membership in secrecy the “Jelly of the Month Club”. And NOT once did Raskin’s signature of approval find this co-sponsoring with Ted Lieu’s H.Res.406, but Raskin was on board in 2020 when that same title under 1029 was introduced, before the 116^th and then the 117^th Congress respectively. And so was Zoe Lofgren part of the “Jelly of the Month Club”, signing on to the Lieu bill, under H.Res.1029. But for some reason this “critical resolution” that would have provided temporary relief to the “Congressional Subpoena” power today constipated by a Peyronie’s hardship - it seems to have disappeared to the LousyLollaPelosi’s dungeon of doom. And low and behold, sure enough it is being held up in the “House Ruins Committee”, and low and behold Jamie Raskin is also part of that “Jelly of the Month Club” in membership. No wonder nothing gets done, as members of Congress are getting bed sores, just too many sitting “Committees” taste testing these “KY” jelly samples. So this is how DEMOCRACY gets the royal shat treatment “shaft”, when things that would be useful right now are sidetracked to the gutter, so it can end up in that cesspool. Like I said, Simple Simon stuff, that is being held-up for a reason I guess I would say there is “Treason” on both sides of the isle. See, if we have not the wherewithal to condemn Donald Trump and his dedication at planning that Insurgency”R”Us, then maybe Adam Schiff was right, if the Congress has not the power to indict this “Murder Most Foul”, then may as well just go home - and of course continue to collect a lucrative salary with benefits. They always leave that part of the equation untouched with these threats to play hooky. Now if you really want the stench, just ask LousyLollaPelsoi as to why she has not issued an “Arrest Warrant” for Bannon, for Meadows, for Clark and all the rest of the “Turdcoats” that have laughed out loud at these “Congressional Subpoenas” bearing the official signature of Beenie Thompson - he’s a “black guy” and do you really believe those White House Supremes in Supremacy care about a subpoena from one of thum - “N” word omitted. 

Look, there is a “Test Case” that finds very little difference from what is confronting the “Select Committee” today, through individuals ignoring an official “subpoena”. Wherein due such irrational defiance by the ignorant the “Congress” issued an “Arrest Warrant”. Yes a bonafide “House ARREST Warrant” was issued upon a subpoenaed “No-Show" and the Sergeant-at-Arms arrested the bastard. So of course when behind bars the criminal asked for leniency under “habeas corpus” and was set free by the court. But not too fast, as that release was immediately appealed to the “High Court”! And guess what, the U.S. Supreme Court was in agreement. It found that the U.S. Congress acting on its own accord, through either the House or Senate acting alone to investigate matters of Congressional concern, each held the exclusive power to issue a subpoena and if it went ignored then rightfully so issue an “Arrest Warrant” - the rest is history. It means NO DOJ interference required!

In McGrain v. Daugherty the finding in opine, Associate Justice Willis Van Devanter(Republican) wrote: “We conclude that the investigation was ordered for a legitimate object; that the witness wrongfully refused to appear and testify before the committee and was lawfully attached; that the Senate is entitled to have him give testimony pertinent to the inquiry, either at its bar or before the committee; and that the district court erred in discharging him from custody under the attachment”. 

So the ignorant bastard was arrested again and made to answer the investigator's questions in satisfaction of the Congressional Committee before being set free. And let us not forget, the Supreme Court does not review federal appeals court judgements that apply precedence set case law to rulings, not without a whole lot of remorse. So most likely if the Congress exercised its power to compel a witness under a subpoena and it went ignored, the Sergeant-at-Arms could be called upon to “Arrest”, aka “attachment” and the individual could be held behind bars until such time cooperation found the criminal providing testimony under oath. And of course any person under “Arrest” could try to exercise one’s inherent rights under “habeas corpus”, but the jury is already out with a verdict on what that means, sorry lock’m up! It's a done deal, it worked before, it will work again as the Supreme Court said so! The High Court is the guiding light in this matter and the "light" is shining bright "sea to shining sea" in jurisprudence.

So why is not Nancy LousyLollaPelosi acting in good faith, to follow the leaders that have already paved the way in the category of “Arrests” with precedence-set the Supreme Court has your back on this one? So again I ask why LousyLolla refuses to use this advantage to arrest Bannon and Meadows and Clark, because she is part of that Insurgency”R”Us…what else could it be? I would wager that she does not want the evidence to see daylight, as it may introduce some very embarrassing things like - like maybe she was made aware of this “Attack” in advance and did nothing because it was a new year and a new month and a “Special Delivery” from the “Jelly of the Month Club” found more interest.

And with this sugar high, well people were killed on that January 6^th, and if LousyLolla was aware of it beforehand to any degree, well for doing nothing she is an “accomplice” to a crime - get it? So the delay tactic is working, not only for the Trump Team but maybe so for the other side of the isle and the way the court’s take the last train to Clarksville through time delays being abused by this Insurgency”R”Us Investigation, well do you really think the next-in-line 118^th Congress will find any interest in keeping this “Select Committee”…hey Adam what “Jelly” did you get?

Self Portrait - Proletariats

 

I can live on rice and beans - Bob Dylan

I can live on hot dogs and beans - Spammy McGee

Some people never worked a day in their life
Don't know what work even means

Meet me at the bottom, don't lag behind
Bring me my boots and shoes
You can hang back or fight your best on the front line
Sing a little bit of these workingman's blues

Soylent Greene

 

LollaPelosi’s Restaurant Massacree

 Thanksgiving Day, and sad that “in thanks” we find the White Supremacy bowing down to “False Prophet” vigilantism as some young punk gets an invite to visit Mar-a-lago, after getting off-the-sandy-hook for “Murder Most Foul”…what a future for this “nice young man” according to the Fuck’n Moron, opportunities galore with the Matt Gatez’ Production Company as the “pedophile circus is in town”. Now of course, that acquittal came from a jury in majority of the minority “Woman is the nigger of the world” still…

My Thansgiving Day Message, to be continued.

Spanky's Gang Select Committee

11/23/21, 11:49 AM Tip Line | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

TIP LINE

Chairman Thompson is interested in any information regarding the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission.

First Name: Stugots
Last Name: Scoregge nella mia testa
Email: Portnoy'sComplaining@USA.com
Phone Number: 202-456-1111

Details:

Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON as “Chairman” along with, ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, LIZ CHENEY, ADAM KINZINGER as “Honorable Members” on the “Select Committee Investigating the January 6th “Attack” on the United States Capitol”;

I am in APOLOGY! Said again, with a lump in my throat, I stand corrected in infamy my mis-Q, so please accept this APOLOGY as an “I’m Sorry”.

See, I went confused as did many other similarly situated “American Patriots” that cared about our Founding Fathers’ DEMOCRACY under attack - confused with respect to what this “Select Committee” was all about upon its ulterior motive in “mission”. But THANK YOU Zoe Lofgren, for setting the record straight. Yes, with Zoe’s tube time on the MSNBC’s “Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell” just yesterday night, Zoe cleared the airwaves in letting “We the People” grasp an understanding of what criteria the “Select Committee” has set as its goals, notwithstanding all the subpoena testimony still absent but on the “Committee’s” hearing docket. To rephrase that “mission” in Zoe’s own prophesy; “You know, in the end” to establish “legislation” or words to that effect wherein “room for mischief is quite minimal. I think we can have some success in narrowing the opportunity for mischief” the latter Zoe’s very own words. So I am lost for words, as I thought to convene this “Committee” following that January 6th Insurgency”R”Us attack on the U.S. Capitol, it was much more than some “Spanky’s Our Gang” slap on the wrist by the schoolmaster, for “mischief” as defined by Webster: playful misbehavior or troublemaking, especially in children.

So once again please accept my apology, as I thought there was more to this attack, but if it were planned and condoned by a bunch of 5th graders in the Oval Office, maybe a spanking is all they need so it won’t happen again.

Since this Select Committee’s “mission statement” is no longer concealed, thanks to Zoe’s transparency, it changes my interest in this “Investigation”. Which means I may forfeit any further attention, as I have more important things to do with my time then waste it on “mischiefs”. The question remains, if I watch the movie titled “Mischief” - comedy/romance circa 1985 - will that be similar to the report that this “Committee” will some day release to the Americans, just trying to vice-versa “narrow” my opportunity.

So Thank You Zoe for clearing things up. By the way, did Eastman produce the documents required by COB on November 22nd, year after the Mischief-in-Chief? Just asking for a Founding Father’s friend. “Narrowing the opportunity for mischief”, by god there ought to be a law!

Hey, that is it, this “Committee” needs a Lincoln! Lincoln, Lincoln. bo-bin-coln, bo-na-na fanna, fo-fin-coln, fee fimo-min-coln, Lincoln! name change! How about “Spanking Committee Investigating the January 6th Mischief on the United States Capitol”.

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.  I'm not a robot

****

11/23/21, 11:49 AM Tip Line - Thank You | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

TIP LINE - THANK YOU

Dear Constituent,

Thank you for contacting the Select Committee and sharing information regarding the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol.

The Select Committee has received your submission and is prepared to follow up on the information you provided as appropriate. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission, unless we determine disclosure is required.

The Select Committee staff will contact you as soon as possible.

Sincerely, Bennie G. Thompson Chairman

Select Committee's Lump of Coal

 11/21/21, 7:28 PM Tip Line | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

TIP LINE

Chairman Thompson is interested in any information regarding the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission.

First Name: Larry
Last Name: Lousy Hat
Email: LousyHatSolidarityParty@USA.com
Phone Number 202-456-1111

Details:

Dear Bennie Thompson as “Chairman” and the coveted members of the “Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol”;

 URGENCY - Happy Holidays

I would hope that during the “Holiday” recess that this “Select Committee”, if it really “pledges an allegiance” and rejoices in that “sworn to oath” responsibility to protect DEMOCRACY to the fullest extent possible as a call to duty, may it find a time out now for a serious take-a-look at Ted Lieu’s H.R. 406. Even though that “resolution” is stalled in “failure mood”, any “House Resolutions” moving forward under pressure may be outside this “Committee’s” purview in responsibilities, such interference in trespass to force feed the passage of this resolution not in delight to the House Speaker or House Leader or House Whip. But no excuse to not try, as no doubt the passage of this “resolution” is well beyond doubt in benefit to your “Committee’s” undertaking. Why this bill remains stalled is not what “We the People” take lightly, it points to a dysfunctional legislative body, especially when such a “resolution” is of utmost legal importance for the “Committee’s” work product. As passage of H.R. 406 would allow the “Committee” to be much more productive. That “resolution” should have found favor in timely passage before this “Committee” began its investigation in earnest, to move forward without it was premature and the way things are turning out so far with what has been produced by your investigation, my assessment is correct so DO NOT try to talk your way out of this dilemma of “subpoena” power impotency. I can only offer my concerns from that of an “outside observer”, as like so with the NO SHOWs ignoring the “subpoenas” your “Committee” has issued, this “Committee’s” practices in response in the same manner as that NO SHOW category, with its so far “Transparency” MIA! I for one am very tired and in turn frustrated to hear again and again that broken-record 15-seconds claim to fame by one of the “Committee’s” members showing up on MSNBC, same old story. And one would think that if this “Committee” were serious in its endeavors, at least a weekly update as a “press release” would be encouraging and indicate this “Committee” is still functioning instead of what appears to be an “asleep-at-the-wheel” of misfortune ere in judgment. That silence may indicate that you have secrets to conceal? Maybe bit off more then…

For sake of clarity, that “resolution” of concern is titled “Congressional Inherent Contempt Resolution”. And Jamie Raskin placed his signature of approval on that “resolution” way back in May of this year in the beginning of the 1st session with the 117th Congress, as a co-sponsor. So if you are interested in the specifics, give Jamie a jingle it’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas! Matter of fact, Zoe was a signatory to that same “resolution” back in 2020 with the 116th, same title and sponsored by Mr. Lieu under H.R. 1029. That said, this means the second attempt by Mr. Lieu for a Simple Simon “House Rules Change” allowing for legislation that would surely benefit this “Committee”. Think of it this way, had that “resolution” been passed instead of gas passed here comes the blind commissioner, by now your “Committee” would be due $500k for Bannon and Meadows and Clark and the other thugs so far just slugs running off sniffing drain-pipes and reciting the Trump manifesto. OK, further in frustration that means 2-members out of 6 on the Democrat’s side as cosponsors of this legislation, even before this “Committee” came to be in selection. I’ll let you do the math on what percentage that means in “AYE” in favor the passage of that “resolution”. And with the $fines$ that could have been, I’ll do the math it means 1/3rd of the “Committee” members yearly Congressional salary confiscated from the thugs! Please ask Adam Schiff if he is also in favor of such legislation which allows your “Committee” to $fine$ the NO-SHOWS, if NOT then why NOT just asking for a Founding Fathers’ friend?

Now on a more serious note, as it appears those individuals that ignore your “Committee’s” subpoenas will also be free to enjoy the Holidays all the time continuing to break the law of “this land is my land this land is your land”. That “resolution” which should have been passed before your “Committee” committed to investigating that GOP driven Insurgency”R”Us of January 6th, IMAGINE how that tool could be used against those individuals that are ignoring “Congressional Subpoenas”. Sad, that somebody jumped the gun before insisting that this “resolution” get passed post haste before you began that motion to get individuals to answer questions under oath. So far your achievements in this area are a total disaster in failure. Maybe it was Nancy Pelosi that has stonewalled that “resolution” to the stale-mate dungeon of no-return as it would not be the first time, like already eluded upon this “resolution” was introduced by Ted back in 2020 under the 116th Congress. Had it been passed in either Congress like it should have been honored, it would have embraced and encouraged the merits of “Congressional Subpoena” in power and augmented that authority to compel testimony. And to reiterate, PLEASE have your MSNBC members STOP saying that the “Committee” is using every tool available to get to the bottom of that ATTACK on the Capitol, as that is an utter LIE. One final thought, for real Jamie Raskin is also a member of the “House Rules Committee” and that is where Lieu’s H.R. 406 is stalled? Tell Jamie to stick a cattle prod up that “Committee’s”…at least get Raskin to prod Chairman McGovern to get this “resolution” passed!

And to reinforce my stand this “using all available tools” is nonsense don’t try and pull that wool, to date your “Committee” has refused to embrace as an advantage one of this nation’s most conservative Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. I am talking Van Devanter, in an opinion delivered with respect to McGrain v. Daugherty. For some reason I am suspect in that respect, as to why you are talking up a good Samaritan “charge” but when we see that there are other things already available that are also being poo-pooed, offers from the High Court setting precedence in efforts to make sure this “Committee” will not get stonewalled…it already happened because maybe Pelosi is afraid to confront the “Reality” that an ex-United States President committed “Treason”. If this were 1927 or any time before that or maybe if the 117th had the guts for glory, any sitting Commander-in-Chief that resorted to planning and executing an attack on the Congress, well the Donald John Trumps would be seen as that individual in the “False Prophets” silhouette of the shadow gallows as is found in Bob Dylan’s “Murder Most Foul” and “We the People Patriots” would be in celebration that DEMOCRACY lives on. The sad thing, it is the U.S. Taxpayers that are paying for your “Committee” to perform its duty, when it appears to this “New England Patriot” that someone on our side is a “Traitor” and supposedly throwing in some pattern of interference, it is not interference from Trump’s minions that are laughing about that NO SHOW subpoena that showed up in the mail. PLESAE get serious about this business your “Committee” has been “selected” to seek justice upon for the sake of “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” in liberty of DEMOCRACY. And until such time your “Committee” and its members surrender its so far refusal to accept the jurisprudence of Van Devanter, you are not taking that January Insurgency”R”Us seriously, else the fact you are afraid to confront the true facts of the matter with tools that would provoke that “being afraid” even more afraid.

So before going home for turkey and stuffing, it is your duty to get H.R. 406 on the docket today, in an “Emergency Order Special Request” to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Leader Clyburn and House Whip Hoyer so it can be on the House floor upon your return to the Capitol for a quick passage. Matter of fact, postpone any and all scheduled “subpoena” hearings until such time that “resolution” is a “tool” at this “Committee’s” disposal, as then you will have something to brag about on MSNBC - when fines are assessed against those that ignore that motion to compel. It may not be the testimony your “Committee” seeks, hey the $money$ talks some semblance of success so not a lost cause. If the House leadership refuses to take it up, then we know the cowards amongst us and this will be the precipice for a failed investigation. I will take your refusal to try and move this H.R. 406 legislation forward on a “fast-track” also as cowardly.

And during this vacation, PLEASE take the time to explain to this “Patriot” why this “Committee” cannot accept the precedence set by this nation’s Supreme Court, with respect to “HOUSE ARREST” power targeting those that ignore a “Congressional Subpoena”, as is found in McGrain v. Daugherty. If it was good enough back some 90-years gone bye-bye by now, yes good enough for a Congress that found the House and Senate under Republican “Majority Rule” allowing the Sergeant-at-Arms to ARREST those that ignore a “Congressional Subpoena”. And to emphasize, the U.S. Supreme Court “concurred” upon such “ARREST POWER”, so why in hell are you wasting “We the People’s” time with this delay maneuver by taking your gripes to the DOJ?

So in ending, this “Committee” has two all important “tools” that should be can be at the “Committee’s” disposal, what is the problem?

Happy Holidays? Not when DEMOCRACY is still under ATTACK as the January 6th Insurgency”R”Us ATTACKERS-in-planning are free to harass your “Committee”, as the ignorance of those already “subpoenaed” is purely that “harassment” in practice and you are letting them get away with it.

STEP UP or STEP OUT? Your “Committee” already found that “STEP OUT” option with H.R. 406 and with McGrain v. Daugherty, but forgot to tell US!

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. I'm not a robot

*****

11/21/21, 7:29 PM Tip Line - Thank You | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

TIP LINE - THANK YOU

Dear Constituent,

Thank you for contacting the Select Committee and sharing information regarding the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol. The Select Committee has received your submission and is prepared to follow up on the information you provided as appropriate. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission, unless we determine disclosure is required.

Sincerely, Bennie G. Thompson Chairman

Good Morning AMERICA

 

Update - January 6th & Congress

 

11/19/21, 12:04 PM Tip Line | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

TIP LINE

Chairman Thompson is interested in any information regarding the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission.

First Name: S. Pam
Last Name: McGee
Email: TheGhostOfSCOTUSJusticeDevanter@USA.com
Phone Number 202-456-1111

Details:

Dear Bennie Thompson as “Chairman” and the coveted members of the “Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol”;

URGENCY - Critically High

It appears your committee is acting like a bunch of 1st year wannabe law students engaged in a “mock” trial. This is not a time to be “experimenting” with “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” its DEMOCRACY! Please be advised that there was a “planned coup” against the U.S. Capitol, which means an attack upon the United States Congress, wherein all law-abiding members of that body placed in harm’s way. It was not a partisan “witch hunt”, it was a bipartisan ATTACK as those scoundrels that acted in bad faith and heeded the calling of this “coup” would not know a Democratic member of Congress verses that of a Republican member. And to prove my point, the United States Vice President Mike Pence had to be rushed to safety. Only because it was a calling of a “Militia” to action, to over-throw the merits of a peaceful transfer of power consistent with the Founding Fathers’ Democracy, at any expense. It failed, God Bless America!

 

But by now, the fact that this “Committee” has not subpoenaed the “King Pin”, namely Donald John Trump, it is beyond comprehension. You must act now, you shall without haste “subpoena” Donald John Trump and if he fails to show up for a scheduled hearing, then you shall resort to the precedence set outcome consistent with McGrain v. Daugherty(circa 1927) and place Donald John Trump under “House Arrest”. The U.S. Supreme Court is on your side already, to call upon the Sergeant-at-Arms to detain individuals that ignore a “Congressional Subpoena”. Once detained, Mr. Trump will find no other option but for to answer all your questions under oath, that will either exonerate or endorse Mr. Trump’s guilt in calling upon his “Militia”, with the intent to overthrow the Capitol, which almost occurred on January 6th of 2021. Donald John Trump will tell the “Truth”, as there is no reason to hide the fact he was the single individual responsible for this attack, as that power to call upon a “Militia” by virtue of his then Commander-in-Chief standing, he owned that power and used it. Then the question remains, it all boils down to a Simple Simon consideration, did he have the power as the sitting Commander-in-Chief to use that so-called “Militia” to overthrow the Capitol in efforts to overthrow his failed election? If your questions are raised in the sense favorably that he did have the power to call upon that “Militia”, he would take pride in that fact. Yes, instigated as a “Trick” question he would fall into the “Trap”. Then you can then focus on the intent - case closed. That will then be the only test left, to determine if that responsibility then meets the merits of “Treason”. There is no reason to think that the testimony of hundreds of witnesses will get you any closer to the “Truth”. It is time to cut to the chase, go after the single individual that held the power as Commander-in-Chief to allow this attack to commence. Yes, it is time to cut to the chase, with an immediate “subpoena” served upon Donald John Trump and when he refuses to abide by the conditions of that “motion”, which will more than likely be the case in ignorance, place him under “House Arrest”. If he finds reason to take his “House Detention” under review with the lower courts through a “writ of habeas corpus”, your committee is covered as the Supreme Court has already ruled the “Congress” maintains the power of “House Arrest” upon individuals that ignore a valid “Congressional Subpoena” and may detain an individual until the detainee answers all questions to the benefit of Congress in consideration the duty of Congress. So why this committee seems to take pride that it has interviewed over 200 individuals that may be telling the truth that may be just speculating, it finds no comfort to what is at stake. I am talking the “Democracy” my father fought for in the trenches overseas! When so far the “Committee” is striking out on getting the attention of those “subpoenaed” that were right-hand men of Donald John Trump during the time this “coup d’etat” was in planning until such time is was unleashed, is not the ultimate goal to get Donald John Trump to testify? So if this “Committee” continues down this unorthodox dead-end street, a mind-boggling journey and I question why the “Select Committee” refrains away from adhering to McGrain v. Daugherty, you are just wasting everyone’s time. So please Go Home as it appears “You Can’t handle the TRUTH” as if you would have already exercised the power of Congress through “McGrain”, Donald John Trump may be eating turkey behind bars!

CAPTCHAThis question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. I'm not a robot

*****

11/19/21, 12:04 PM Tip Line - Thank You | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol  

TIP LINE - THANK YOU

Dear Constituent,

Thank you for contacting the Select Committee and sharing information regarding the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol.

The Select Committee has received your submission and is prepared to follow up on the information you provided as appropriate. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission, unless we determine disclosure is required.

Sincerely, Bennie G. Thompson Chairman

McCarthy v. LollaPelosi

 

U,S. House of Ill-Refute "floor debate" 

Peyronie's Scorecard for November 18th, 2021

Nanny LollaPelosi = 10inches w/bending room
Kevin McCarthy = 3inches w/dent

Bob Dylan's White House

Just today while I was out and about walking around the perimeter of the White House, because as a member of the Commander-in-Chief's "Militia" I have been called to duty to protect DEMOCRACY against the GOP's Insurgency"R"Us tinsane Fuck'n Moronism, wow, guess what was blurring out of the window of the Oval Office! Way to Go Joe!

There's an evenin' haze settlin' over the town
Starlight by the edge of the creek
The buyin' power of the proletariat's gone down
Money's gettin' shallow and weak

Where the place I love best is a sweet memory
It's a new path that we trod
They say low wages are reality
If we want to compete abroad

My cruel weapons have been put on the shelf
Come sit down on my knees
You are dearer to me than myself
As you yourself can see

While I'm listenin' to the steel rails hum
Got both eyes tight shut
Just sitting here tryin' to keep the hunger from
Creeping its way into my gut

Meet me at the bottom, don't lag behind
Bring me my boots and shoes
You can hang back or fight your best on the front line
Sing a little bit of these workingman's blues

Well, I'm sailin' on back, ready for the long haul
Tossed by the winds and the seas
I'll drag 'em all down to hell and I'll stand 'em at the wall
I'll sell 'em to their enemies

I'm tryin' to feed my soul with thought
Gonna sleep off the rest of the day
Sometimes no one wants what we've got
Sometimes you can't give it away

Now the place is ringed with countless foes
Some of them may be deaf and dumb
No man, no woman knows
The hour that sorrow will come

In the dark I hear the night birds call
I can hear a lover's breath
I sleep in the kitchen with my feet in the hall
Sleep is like a temporary death

Meet me at the bottom, don't lag behind
Bring me my boots and shoes
You can hang back or fight your best on the front line
Sing a little bit of these workingman's blues

Well, they burned my barn and they stole my horse
I can't save a dime
I got to be careful, I don't want to be forced
Into a life of continual crime

I can see for myself that the sun is sinking
How I wish you were here to see
Tell me now, am I wrong in thinking
That you have forgotten me?

Now they worry and they hurry and they fuss and they fret
They waste your nights and days
Them I will forget
But you I'll remember always

Old memories of you to me have clung
You've wounded me with words
Gonna have to straighten out your tongue
It's all true, everything you have heard

Meet me at the bottom, don't lag behind
Bring me my boots and shoes
You can hang back or fight your best on the front line
Sing a little bit of these workingman blues

In you, my friend, I find no blame
Wanna look in my eyes, please do
No one can ever claim
That I took up arms against you

All across the peaceful sacred fields
They will lay you low
They'll break your horns and slash you with steel
I say it so it must be so

Now I'm down on my luck and I'm black and blue
Gonna give you another chance
I'm all alone, I'm expecting you
To lead me off in a cheerful dance

I got a brand new suit and a brand new wife
I can live on rice and beans
Some people never worked a day in their life
Don't know what work even means

Well, meet me at the bottom, don't lag behind
Bring me my boots and shoes
You can hang back or fight your best on the front line
Sing a little bit of these workingman's blues

Songwriters: Bob Dylan 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGT7XQ9XdKI

Alyeska Pipeline Service Company

 

Sneak preview soon, anticipated publish date January 20th, 2022.

A Poem for Today

 My Charles Bukowski Day

.

The end

Select Committee "In Training"

 

11/17/21, 12:06 PM Tip Line | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

TIP LINE

Chairman Thompson is interested in any information regarding the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission.

First Name: Stugots
Last Name: Scoregge nella mia testa
Email: TrainTheTrainer@USA.com
Phone Number 202-456-1111

Details:

Dear BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ZOE LOFGREN, ELAINE LURIA, ADAM SCHIFF, PETE AGUILAR, STEPHANIE MURPHY, JAMIE RASKIN, LIZ CHENEY, ADAM KINZINGER. As honorable members “In Training” for the Select Committee Investigating the January 6^th Attack on the United States Capitol, please find below the syllabus for this week’s “Contempt of Congress 101” study guide. “We the People” feel that once this membership successfully completes this training course, and not until then, as then and only then will this committee have the necessary background to make a worthwhile investigation. Please study this “syllabus” and render an “opine” with details on how it could be used in your upcoming investigation, wherein subpoenas may be required but those served ignore such valid motions. Please deliver your answer by December 1^st, this year. It is hoped that the membership completes and passes the “bar” provided through this critical training, that which is required for this investigation so that come the New Year an investigation can commence in earnest without opposing stonewalling, wherein we hope the guesswork in the need of subpoenas ignored has been so learned. Any questions, contact your mentor.

McGRAIN, Deputy Sergent at Arms of the United States Senate,
v.
DAUGHERTY.

No. 28.

Argued Dec. 5, 1924.

Decided Jan. 17, 1927.

Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

1

This is an appeal from the final order in a proceeding in habeas corpus discharging a recusant witness held in custody under process of attachment issued from the United States Senate in the course of an investigation which it was making of the administration of the Department of Justice. A full statement of the case is necessary.

6

In the course of the investigation the committee issued and caused to be duly served on Mally S. Daugherty-who was a brother of Harry M. Daugherty and president of the Midland National Bank of Washington Court House, Ohio-a subpoena commanding him to appear before the committee for the purpose of giving testimony bearing on the subject under investigation, and to bring with him the 'deposit ledgers of the Midland National Bank since November 1, 1920; also note files and transcript of owners of every safety vault; also records of income drafts; also records of any individual account or accounts showing withdrawals of amounts of $25,000 or over during above period.' The witness failed to appear.

9

'Whereas, the appearance and testimony of the said M. S. Daugherty is material and necessary in order that the committee may properly execute the functions imposed upon it and may obtain information necessary as a basis for such legislative and other action as the Senate may deem necessary and proper: Therefore be it

10

'Resolved, that the president of the Senate pro tempore issue his warrant commanding the sergeant at arms or his deputy to take into custody the body of the said M. S. Daugherty wherever found, and to bring the said M. S. Daugherty before the bar of the Senate, then and there to answer such questions pertinent to the matter under inquiry as the Senate may order the President of the Senate pro tempore to propound, and to keep the said M. S. Daugherty in custody to await the further order of the Senate.'

11

It will be observed from the terms of the resolution that the warrant was to be issued in furtherance of the effort be obtain the personal testimony of the witness, and, like the second subpoena, was not intended to exact from him the production of the various records, books, and papers named in the first subpoena.

12

The warrant was issued agreeably to the resolution and was addressed simply to the sergeant at arms. That officer, on receiving the warrant, indorsed thereon a direction that it be executed by John J. McGrain, already his deputy, and delivered it to him for execution.

13

The deputy, proceeding under the warrant, took the witness into custody at Cincinnati, Ohio, with the purpose of bringing him before the bar of the Senate as commanded, whereupon the witness petitioned the federal District Court in Cincinnati for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was granted and the deputy made due return, setting forth the warrant and the cause of the detention. After a hearing the court held the attachment and detention unlawful and discharged the witness, the decision being put on the ground that the Senate, in directing the investigation and in ordering the attachment, exceeded its powers under the Constitution. 299 F. 620. The deputy prayed and was allowed a direct appeal to this court under section 238 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1215) as then existing.

75

We conclude that the investigation was ordered for a legitimate object; that the witness wrongfully refused to appear and testify before the committee and was lawfully attached; that the Senate is entitled to have him give testimony pertinent to the inquiry, either at its bar or before the committee; and that the district court erred in discharging him from custody under the attachment.

84

What has been said requires that the final order in the district court discharging the witness from custody be reversed.

85

Final order reversed.

~ END of Training Syllabus ~

 

11/17/21, 12:08 PM Tip Line - Thank You | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

TIP LINE - THANK YOU

Dear Constituent,

Thank you for contacting the Select Committee and sharing information regarding the January 6th attack on the United State’s Capitol.

The Select Committee has received your submission and is prepared to follow up on the information you provided as appropriate. We respect your need to remain confidential and will use your contact information only to follow up with you regarding your submission, unless we determine disclosure is required.

Sincerely, Bennie G. Thompson Chairman

New Book: FUCK YOU Uncle Al

"the Raskolnikov of jerking off – the sticky evidence is everywhere!”

Philip Roth